|
|
|
Corruption
Azerbaijan’s corruption woes stretch from the grassroots level up to the
highest echelons of government. To tackle the ill, in 2004 the
government passed an anti-corruption law that specifies the obligations
of government officials. A proposed law would also require all public
officials to report their annual income and property to a state
commission for inspection. It’s a start, but how much further should the
reforms go?
|
|
|
Pro-Government: Yeni Azerbaijan Party (YAP):
YAP argues that corruption exists everywhere in the world, but maintains
that “economic tools” are the best way to fight the problem in
Azerbaijan. Among these tools, YAP Deputy Executive Secretary Mubariz
Gurbanly cites the “[i]ntensification of economic reforms, protecting
property owners’ rights and giving Azerbaijanis a sense of ownership,
increasing salaries of bureaucrats and law-enforcement agencies.”
Gurbanly mentions the Anti-Corruption Council created by President Ilham
Aliyev in 2005 as effective for administrative measures, and points to
the creation of “state bodies and commissions fighting corruption” as a
sign that the government recognizes the extent of the problem. As of
2005, he adds, all state officials must declare their incomes. “YAP does
not think that the development of punishment mechanisms will eliminate
corruption in the country. First of all, we should develop economic
reforms and educate people.”
|
|
|
Opposition: Azadlig (Freedom) Bloc:
“We are for progressive reforms which will eliminate corruption and
establish fair trials,” says Fakhmin Hajiyev, deputy head of Azadlig
Bloc’s campaign. “Azadlig advocates formation of a free market economy
and establishing equal opportunities for all economic players.
Anti-corruption legislation should be properly implemented, special
rules for public employment should be introduced. Executive, judiciary
and parliamentary powers should act as a check on each other. Increasing
parliament’s control mechanism is necessary. All of these will be
possible only if free and fair elections are held in November 2005
because the ruling regime benefits from corruption and legal nihilism.”
|
|
|
Opposition: Yeni Siyasat (YeS – New Policy) Bloc:
“Corruption is the number one danger to the country,” says YeS campaign
manager Rashid Hajili. “The most forward-thinking way of fighting
corruption is by holding free and fair parliamentary elections in
Azerbaijan in November 2005. And then the legitimate parliament will
take the necessary administrative, legal, economic and political steps
to reduce or solve this problem.”
|
|
|
Opposition: Liberal Party of Azerbaijan (LPA):
“Corruption is the main enemy of Azerbaijan and the LPA is the main
enemy of corruption,” Liberal Party Deputy Chairman Avaz Temirkhan
declared. The party stresses, however, that it does not call for
“repressive measures” for eliminating the ill. Rather, it is betting on
increasing parliament’s oversight of the government. “ A special body
should be established for controlling executive agencies and the head of
this body should be nominated by the opposition and approved by
parliament.”
|
|
|
Candidate: Ilgar Mammadov, Independent
Constituency: # 8 Binagadi 1st
Location: Baku suburb
“The government’s attitude toward corruption should change from the
current ‘It exists everywhere in the world’ to ‘It is shameful,’” says
Mammadov. “Schools and universities must be cleaned up first: nothing
should teach the younger generation to be corrupt. Local government
reform should make municipalities smaller, closer to these people, and
give these elected bodies more authority than the executive branch. This
would dramatically reduce corruption in day-to-day life. Anti-corruption
reforms in the judiciary must be implemented immediately and with the
greatest vigor.”
|
|
|
Candidate: Ayten Shirinova, Independent
Constituency: # 29 Sabail
Location: Downtown Baku
“This is one of the most serious and deepest problems that Azerbaijan
faced as part of the USSR. Recently, the government has tried to take a
certain steps to solve this problem; in particular, the law against
corruption has been adopted [in 2004]. But corruption has become a
social problem and solving this problem through legislation does not
lead to the expected results. We need time to change the way of thinking
in society, to change [our] mentality.”
|
|
|