|
|
|
Oil Revenues
How to manage the distribution of oil revenues has been one of the key
political debates in Azerbaijan during recent years. Roughly $1 billion
exists in the country’s oil fund, but some observers expect total
state oil revenues to be double that for 2005 alone. With an economy
largely driven by hydrocarbons, the country’s future prosperity
could well depend on how the government chooses to make use of this
wealth.
|
|
|
Pro-Government: Yeni Azerbaijan Party (YAP):
The ruling party argues that Azerbaijan’s constitution does not
provide for parliamentary control of the State Oil Fund, and credits
“the correct policy” of President Ilham Aliyev for keeping
oil revenues in the Fund “for the benefit of future
generations.” The Oil Fund’s current balance of $1.2 billion
“can be compared with the state budgets of some countries,”
says Deputy Executive Secretary Mubariz Gurbanly. «Some people
think that we should spend this money now. But YAP thinks about the
future. In 40-50 years, Azerbaijan will have no oil and we should invest
this money in the creation of economic zones [in the economy’s
non-oil sector].” While supporting transparency in the management
of Azerbaijan’s oil revenues, Gurbanly argues that management
decisions should be the domain of only a few government and Oil Fund
officials, plus the president. Says Gurbanly: “If we will arrange
a public discussion on how to use the oil money, we will receive 3
million ideas. The president has been given responsibility to make
decisions on this issue and we are satisfied with the results.”
|
|
|
Opposition: Azadlig (Freedom) Bloc:
The bloc favors parliamentary control of the distribution of oil
revenues and states that it is ready to cooperate with international
financial institutions and organizations to establish such control.
“In no case should oil be used for political bargaining,”
Fakhmin Hajiyev, deputy head of Azadlig’s campaign argues.
“Oil revenues should be spent not only on social needs, but also
on development of the non-oil sector and liberal economic reforms which
need financial support.”
|
|
|
Opposition: Yeni Siyasat (YeS – New Policy) Bloc:
The bloc argues that greater transparency is needed in the distribution
of oil revenues from the State Oil Fund and in the Fund’s
activities. “Parliament should exercise greater control over
that,” says campaign manager Rashid Hajili. “Parliament
alone should approve all spending of money from the Oil Fund.”
|
|
|
Opposition: Liberal Party of Azerbaijan (LPA):
The party supports placing the State Oil Fund and the distribution of
oil revenues under parliament’s full control. “One-third of
the oil revenues should go directly to the bank account of every single
Azerbaijani citizen,” says Deputy Chairman Avaz Temirkhan. «
And a significant part of the oil revenues should go to investments in
the non-oil sector of the economy.”
|
|
|
Candidate: Rustam Aliyev, New Parliament – New Names Bloc, Owner of FM
radio station
Constituency: #55, Khachmaz
Location: Khachmaz region, North Azerbaijan, along border with Russia
Aliyev advocates greater transparency in the distribution of oil
revenues and calls for money from the State Oil Fund to be spent in part
on educational reform, as well as the development of the economy’s
non-oil sector. “It is of the utmost importance that oil revenues
have an impact on the human capital of Azerbaijan.”
|
|
|
Candidate: Ilgar Mammadov, Independent
Constituency: # 8 Binagadi 1st
Location: Baku suburb
The State Oil Fund should be used to establish a program for sending
young Azerbaijanis to universities in the US and Europe and to provide
for them to receive job training overseas, on condition of their
eventual return to Azerbaijan. It should also focus on providing for the
needs of indigent regions of Georgia with heavy concentrations of ethnic
Azerbaijanis, and, later, expand this economic development assistance
throughout the South Caucasus. The government should also concentrate on
infrastructure development within Azerbaijan, Mammadov says, but keep
close watch on the expenditure of related funds.
|
|
|