EURASIA INSIGHT
1/23/09
Print this article
Email this article
Uzbekistan has pledged to export gas exclusively via Russia. Tashkent presently has the potential to pump up to 31 billion cubic meters of gas to Russia annually via Gazprom-owned infrastructure.
"Uzbekistan sells gas to Russia and only Russia, while it is entirely up to Russia what to do with it next," the official Russian news agency RIA Novosti quoted Uzbek President Islam Karimov as saying.
Meanwhile, the Russian oil giant LUKoil plans to invest $5 billion in Uzbek gas projects over the next seven years. The money will be used to help boost Uzbekistans export capacity, specifically to speed development of the Kandim and Gissar deposits in southern Uzbekistan, according to the Uzbek daily Vesti. The LUKoil investment was announced after a meeting between LUKoil boss Vagit Alekperov and Karimov amid Russian President Dmitry Mededevs two-day visit to the Central Asian state, Uzbek and Russian news outlets reported January 23.
"LUKoil for us is a time-tested partner. Throughout the time of our cooperation, the company has proved to be a very reliable, honest and efficient partner, and whats more important, one who has a very attentive attitude," Karimov was quoted as saying.
Gissar is projected to produce 3 billion cubic meters of gas and more than 300,000 tons of oil per year. Gas exports from Kandim will hit 12 billion cubic meters per year by 2013, the Vesti report added.
Posted January 23, 2009 © Eurasianet
http://www.eurasianet.org
|
The Central Eurasia Project aims, through its website,
meetings, papers, and grants, to foster a more informed
debate about the social, political and economic
developments of the Caucasus and Central Asia.
It is a program of the Open Society
Institute-New York. The Open Society Institute-New
York is a private operating and grantmaking foundation
that promotes the development of open societies around
the world by supporting educational, social, and legal
reform, and by encouraging alternative
approaches to complex and controversial issues.
The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily
represent the position of the Open Society Institute and
are the sole responsibility of the author or
authors.
|
|