|
PHOTO ESSAY: TENSION IN KYRGYZSTAN'S AK-SUI
Saniya Sagnaeva: 4/6/02
More than two weeks after violent protests in Kyrgyzstan's
southern Ak-Sui district, the country is still reeling. The
lower house of Kyrgyzstan's parliament met behind closed doors
April 2 to discuss the violence, which erupted after police
blocked supporters of opposition legislator Azimbek Beknazarov
from entering the district, where he was to be sentenced on
corruption charges.
The closed-door session was to begin an official investigation
of the causes of the tragedy, Kyrgyz radio reported. This
comes after the country's parliament found itself bitterly
divided over an appeal for order that characterizes opposition
leaders as "intriguers" and accuses them of "fomenting
tensions," leading protesters to commit "illegal
actions." Fifty-five of the parliament's 105 deputies
signed the appeal, amid angry condemnations from opposition
deputies - as well as calls for Interior Minister Temirbek
Akmataliev's resignation - RFE/RL reported. None of the appeal's
55 signatories had visited the region.
Meanwhile, photographer Saniya Sagnaeva was in Ak-Sui, documenting
the mood on the street there. She took these pictures of police
and protesters - among them human rights activist and hunger
striker Tursunbek Akunov - as they wait out the tension in
Ak-Sui. Sagnaeva's photos were taken in the days following
the March 17-18 clashes, which left at least five dead and
scores wounded. [For
more information, see the Eurasia Insight archives].
Email this article
Posted April 4, 2002 © Eurasianet
http://www.eurasianet.org
 |
 |
The Central Eurasia Project aims, through its website,
meetings, papers, and grants, to foster a more informed
debate about the social, politcal and economic developments
of the Caucasus and Central Asia. It is a program of the
Open Society Institute-New York. The Open Society Institute-New
York is a private operating and grantmaking foundation
that promotes the development of open societies around
the world by supporting educational, social, and legal
reform, and by encouraging alternative approaches to complex
and controversial issues.
The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily
represent the position of the Open Society Institute
and are the sole responsibility of the author or authors.
|
 |
 |
|