|
KAZAKHSTAN'S SPACESHIP JUNKYARD
A EurasiaNet Photo Essay by Jonas Bendiksen
Text by Laara Matsen
On April 16, Russia announced that it would henceforth launch
military satellites at the Pletsnesk cosmodrome in northern
Russia, ending the practice of launching satellites from the
Baikonur Cosmodrome in Kazakhstan. This shift will deprive
Kazakh children of the chance to watch some satellites take
off, though Baikonur will remain the launchpad for commercial
"birds" and manned missions. As these photos show,
it will also spare Kazakhs the fallout, literal and otherwise,
that occurs in a launch's wake.
All space-bound rockets consist largely of fuel tanks and
booster stages that fall back to earth when spent, never reaching
orbit. In landlocked Baikonur, Russia's primary launching
complex in Kazakhstan, these spaceships crash to earth. This
photo essay visits the areas where the supporting rockets
land, and shows the people living under the flight paths who
contend with flaming spaceship wrecks several times each month.
Apart from the fear of having a spaceship crash through their
roofs, residents in the area complain of the ill effects of
leftover toxic rocket fuel. With the relocation of Russian
military launches, more than half of which currently take
off from Baikonur, these people may get some relief. However,
one group of people is probably sorry to see Baikonur lose
business; the region's scrap metal dealers are getting rich
trading metal from the rockets' titanium alloy hulls.

Email this article
Posted April 19, 2002 © Eurasianet
http://www.eurasianet.org
 |
 |
The Central Eurasia Project aims, through its website,
meetings, papers, and grants, to foster a more informed
debate about the social, politcal and economic developments
of the Caucasus and Central Asia. It is a program of the
Open Society Institute-New York. The Open Society Institute-New
York is a private operating and grantmaking foundation
that promotes the development of open societies around
the world by supporting educational, social, and legal
reform, and by encouraging alternative approaches to complex
and controversial issues.
The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily
represent the position of the Open Society Institute
and are the sole responsibility of the author or authors.
|
 |
 |
|