KARABAKH LEGACY RAVAGES ARMENIAN CHILDREN
A EurasiaNet Photo Essay by German Avakian: 5/23/03

click here to begin

Though Armenia and Azerbaijan agreed to a ceasefire in 1994 that stopped the fighting over Nagorno-Karabakh, landmines and unexploded ordnance continue to claim victims. Since the ceasefire, children have been among those most prone to death and injury from leftover weaponry. This EurasiaNet photo essay shows depicts the ongoing suffering caused by the Karabakh conflict.

During the war, approximately 900 square kilometers of the conflict zone were sown with landmines. The International Committee to Ban Landmines, citing Armenian government estimates, says up to 80,000 landmines in an around Karabakh remain unaccounted for. Many maps of minefields have simply been lost. In other instances, no maps or records of minefield locations were ever created.

These mines pose the greatest danger to children, who do not recognize the danger that they pose. Unused weaponry also threatens children who treat them as toys, or even as potential sources of income. For example, two years ago in the Taush region’s village of Sev Kar, nine-year-old Djivan Dallakian and a friend tried to procure the blue metal from a tank shell to sell for scrap. Djivan’s friend perished from the explosion. Djivan was seriously wounded and still suffers from headaches and nightmares.

Not far from the village of Aygeovit, the Armenian army removed artillery from a military base but left shells behind. For several years afterward, teenagers "extracted" material from these shells for use in making fireworks or firecrackers. In December 1997, four classmates found dozens of shells and set about preparing a holiday fireworks show. After an errant hammer blow, one boy died and two lost their legs. A fourth underwent multiple leg surgeries in Yerevan.

Carelessness by adults often exposes children to risk. In 1996, 13-year-old Mikhael Yeghonian found a detonator from a hand grenade along the road in the Taush region. He toyed with the detonator before the device exploded in his hand, tearing off his fingers. The detonator had reportedly been discarded on the street by someone from the village. Many people, fearing or mistrusting the authorities, throw their weapons away rather than hand them over to the army or police.

Neither Armenia nor Azerbaijan has signed the 1997 Mine Ban Treaty, and Armenia has said that it will not do so before Azerbaijan does. Some emphasized the idea that de-mining might contribute to a weakening in the country’s defense. In 2002, though, Yerevan moderated its stance [For background click here].

Ronco, a Washington, DC-based consulting firm, has helped the Armenian government establish the National Mine Action Center in Echmiadzin, where sappers are now trained. Yerevan hosted an international de-mining conference in October 2002, with the assistance of the Canadian government, and the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe.

These policy developments may help raise awareness in Armenia about the landmine threat. However, public policy advocates are also calling for a nationwide educational program specifically targeted for children. Without such educational efforts, the list of victims of a long-ago war will continue to grow.

Editor’s Note: German Avakian is an Armenian photographer. He says his specialty involves portraits of "people who are studiously avoided by the government and politicians."

Email this article
Posted May 23, 2003 © Eurasianet
http://www.eurasianet.org

	The Central Eurasia Project aims, through its website, meetings, papers, and grants, to foster a more informed debate about the social, political and economic developments of the Caucasus and Central Asia. It is a program of the Open Society Institute-New York. The Open Society Institute-New York is a private operating and grantmaking foundation that promotes the development of open societies around the world by supporting educational, social, and legal reform, and by encouraging alternative approaches to complex and controversial issues. The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily represent the position of the Open Society Institute and are the sole responsibility of the author or authors.