|
THE TALIBANS LEGACY IN KANDAHAR
A EurasiaNet Photo Essay by Ed Grazda:
10/10/03
Kandahar served as the spiritual center for the Taliban movement, whose radical Islamic fighters conquered most of Afghanistan before being driven from power in 2001 by the US-led campaign against terrorism. Evidence of the Talibans legacy abounds in and around Kandahar, as this photo essay by Edward Grazda shows. After the Taliban gained control of the Afghan capital Kabul in 1996, the movement authorized a large number of public works projects in Kandahar. The first order of business was improving the main transport link between the countrys seat of political power, Kabul, and its new religious center, Kandahar. Over 40 miles of road, linking Kabul with the large town of Maidan, were paved. Along the roads to Kandahar, the Taliban built mosques to help believers fulfill their Islamic obligation of praying five times daily. There is also an abundance of road signs featuring sayings from Islams holy book, the Koran. In the city itself, the Taliban erected a lone street light at a central intersection. These days the light does not work. Many of the projects launched under the Taliban, including the Mullah Omar Mosque and Shopping Complex, remain unfinished. Another project that was remains to be completed is a mausoleum for Mullah Omar, the Talibans top leader, who remains at large.
Email this article
Posted October 10, 2003
© Eurasianet
http://www.eurasianet.org
 |
 |
The Central Eurasia Project aims, through its website,
meetings, papers, and grants, to foster a more informed
debate about the social, political and economic developments
of the Caucasus and Central Asia. It is a program of the
Open Society Institute-New York. The Open Society Institute-New
York is a private operating and grantmaking foundation
that promotes the development of open societies around
the world by supporting educational, social, and legal
reform, and by encouraging alternative approaches to complex
and controversial issues.
The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily
represent the position of the Open Society Institute and
are the sole responsibility of the author or authors.
|
 |
 |
|