|
Azeri state TV says one third of votes counted,
ruling party keeps massive lead
Excerpts from report by Azerbaijani TV on 6th November
[Presenter] Dear viewers, Azerbaijani state television [channel
one] has been continuing its broadcasts for 30 hours and we
will now give you the latest information on the election results
by joining the election information centre where our correspondent
will give us the latest data.
[Correspondent] Here is the latest information. By now 33.10
per cent of the information on protocols No 1 and No 2 has
been received.
[Passage omitted: many of the territorial electoral commissions
have not so far sent protocols]
Results on the proportional representation list.
1. New Azerbaijan Party - 73.92 per cent
2. People's Front of Azerbaijan Party - 4.84 per cent
3. Musavat Party - 4.54 per cent
4. Party for National Independence of Azerbaijan - 3.74 per
cent
5. Communist Party of Azerbaijan - 3.04 per cent
6 Civic Solidarity Party - 2.38 per cent
7. Democratic Party of Azerbaijan - 1.25 per cent
8. Liberal Party of Azerbaijan - 1.06 per cent
9. Alliance for Azerbaijan Party - 0.71 per cent
10. National Congress Party - 0.54 per cent
11 Against all parties - 0.51 per cent
12. Democratic Azerbaijan Bloc - 0.28 per cent
13.People's Democratic Party of Azerbaijan - 0.24 per cent
14. Democratic World Party of Azerbaijan - 0.18 per cent
[Passage omitted: data on the first-past-the-post system
of elections]
Source: Azerbaijani TV, Channel One, Baku, in Azeri 0700
gmt 06 Nov 00
BBC Mon TCU 061100 km/fm
Email this article
Posted November 7, 2000 © Eurasianet
http://www.eurasianet.org
 |
 |
The Central Eurasia Project aims, through its website,
meetings, papers, and grants, to foster a more informed
debate about the social, political and economic developments
of the Caucasus and Central Asia. It is a program of the
Open Society Institute-New York. The Open Society Institute-New
York is a private operating and grantmaking foundation
that promotes the development of open societies around
the world by supporting educational, social, and legal
reform, and by encouraging alternative approaches to complex
and controversial issues.
The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily
represent the position of the Open Society Institute
and are the sole responsibility of the author or authors.
|
 |
 |
|