EURASIA INSIGHT
Rovshan Ismayilov
4/04/07
Print this article
Email this article
While Irans April 4 decision to release 15 captured British soldiers made headlines worldwide, in Azerbaijan, the Islamic Republics northern neighbor, news consumers had a more immediate concern: the need to preserve their countrys neutrality in the face of ongoing hostility between Tehran and the West.
For both cultural and economic reasons, relations with Iran, which accounted for 30 percent of Azerbaijans trade turnover in 2006, have long been important for Azerbaijan, whose population, like Irans, is predominantly Shia. The Azerbaijani government has consistently called for a diplomatic resolution to the differences between Iran and the United States, and asserted its own strict neutrality in the dispute.
"We do not want new conflicts in the region and we insist that the issue must be solved by diplomatic means," the Voice of America quoted Azerbaijani Foreign Minister Elmar Mammadyarov as saying on March 19, just prior to a trip to Washington, DC. "New conflict may turn into disaster for the region."
Nonetheless, that emphasis on the middle ground appears to have done little to assuage many ordinary Azerbaijanis growing sense of unease. Concerns worsened on March 30, when the Realniy Azerbaijan (Real Azerbaijan) weekly, the countrys largest selling newspaper, published what it claimed was a list of Azerbaijani sites Iran intends to bomb if it is attacked by the United States. No source was named for the report, but the alleged sites named – ranging from the presidential administration to British Petroleums office in Baku – set off panicked discussions among readers.
In part, the reactions are aggravated by a growing tendency among Azerbaijani media and many citizens to discuss the topic of a US military attack against Iran not as a question of "whether?", but of "when?" and "how?" – this despite repeated denials by American officials that plans exist for such an operation.
"Iran is surrounded by three US aircraft carriers and 29 others ships and US military bases," commented political analyst Vafa Guluzade on the Day.az website. "And the fact that in this situation the country is not heeding UN resolutions makes war unavoidable."
Some of the strongest private reactions to the issue can be heard among Azerbaijans growing number of Muslim faithful. "No Muslim would support destroying a Muslim country. But Allah supports Iran," commented Meshadi Alemdar, mullah of the Blue Mosque. Tofig Guliyev, a former professional wrestler who worships at the Teze Pir mosque, agrees. "We are witnessing a new crusade against the Muslim world. Why is Israel allowed to do everything, while Iranians cannot even think about a peaceful nuclear industry?"
Muslim community leaders, however, have been careful to stress that they are not choosing sides between the US and Iran. The topic of Irans nuclear research or likely US responses is not one that is openly discussed or the subject of public prayers or sermons in either of Bakus two largest Shia mosques, Teze Pir and the Blue Mosque. "We support a peaceful resolution of the problem," Allashukur Pashazade, head of Azerbaijans Caucasus Muslims Department, said in an April 3 statement to journalists, Turan news agency reported.
Regions of Azerbaijan with the closest ties to Iran – the southern region of Lankaran and the Nakhchivan Autonomous Republic exclave – share that desire for neutrality.
Within Nakhchivan, a territory sandwiched between Armenia and Iran, residents largest fear is what a US attack on Iran would mean for their energy supplies, and for their communications with Azerbaijan, noted Malahat Nasibova, a Nakhchivan-based human rights champion and freelance journalist. Iran provides 100 percent of the regions gas supplies and meets 30 percent of its electricity needs. It also provides the only ground route linking the exclave with the rest of Azerbaijan.
"The biggest concerns have socio-economic roots," Nasibova said. "It is understandable. Thanks to Iran, natural gas appeared in Nakhchivan again in 2005 after [an absence of] 15 years."
Meanwhile, in the southern region of Lankaran, which borders directly on Iran and has close cultural and trade links with the country, most residents immediate concern is that Azerbaijan simply maintains the status quo, noted one journalist.
"If it would have happened five years ago or even before, the picture would be different," said Bakhtiyar Akhundov, a television reporter based in the region. "[At that time] Iranian emissaries enjoyed serious influence and conducted propaganda in the local mosques. However, law-enforcement agencies have undertaken [special] measures during the last years and there is … no longer any public propaganda here now."
While a small group of Lankaran residents hope a military attack on Iran could lead to the union of Azerbaijan with Irans northern, ethnic Azeri-dominated territory, he continued, the fear that Lankaran would then be overrun by refugees from Iran prompts most individuals to favor neutrality.
As elsewhere in Azerbaijan, the overwhelming preference is for calm. Said Akhundov: "People do not want to upset the more or less quiet life in our region."
Editor’s Note: Rovshan Ismayilov is a freelance reporter based in Baku.
Posted April 4, 2007 © Eurasianet
http://www.eurasianet.org
|
The Central Eurasia Project aims, through its website,
meetings, papers, and grants, to foster a more informed
debate about the social, political and economic
developments of the Caucasus and Central Asia.
It is a program of the Open Society
Institute-New York. The Open Society Institute-New
York is a private operating and grantmaking foundation
that promotes the development of open societies around
the world by supporting educational, social, and legal
reform, and by encouraging alternative
approaches to complex and controversial issues.
The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily
represent the position of the Open Society Institute and
are the sole responsibility of the author or
authors.
|
|