EURASIA INSIGHT
Haroutiun Khachatrian
5/22/06
Print this article
Email this article
Artur Baghdasarian formally vacated on May 22 his post as Armenias parliamentary speaker, completing the withdrawal of his Orinats Yerkir Party from the countrys governing coalition. Experts in Yerevan dont expect the shake-up to have much of an immediate impact on government policy, but suggest that the withdrawal could boost both Baghdasarians and his partys political fortunes in upcoming elections.
Addressing MPs after the acceptance of his letter of resignation, Baghdasarian sounded like a politician already on the campaign trail. Armenia is scheduled to hold parliamentary elections in 2007 and a presidential poll the following year. "Social surveys show that 70 percent of Armenias population is afraid. ... We will fight for a free society," Baghdasarian said, according to a report distributed by the A1-Plus web site. "When we said that the state must support young families, they [political rivals] said it was populism. It is not populism; it is the road to the development of our country."
Baghdasarian also maintained it was in the countrys best interest to pursue integration with Western economic and security structures, while attempting to cast Orinats Yerkirs departure from the governing coalition as the party leaderships choice. ""Many good things have been accomplished, but many have been left out," Baghdasarian said, referring to his partys participation in the governing coalition. "Now we have decided to follow our own route." In addressing parliament, Baghdasarian studiously avoided criticism of President Robert Kocharian.
Baghdasarian signaled on May 12 his intention to resign as speaker, a day after party leaders voted to pull out of the coalition. Although seeking to portray themselves as the initiators, many experts believe that Prime Minister Andranik Markarian pushed Orinats Yerkir, or the Country of Law party, out of the coalition for conduct damaging to the governments interests. In the weeks leading up to his resignation, the former speaker had been outspoken in his criticism of the governments continued reliance on a special political relationship with Russia. Starting with an April 19 interview published in the influential German daily Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, he began to make forceful appeals for Armenia to turn away from Russia and toward the European Union and NATO. [For background see the Eurasia Insight archive].
Markarian has maintained that Baghdasarians actions constituted a violation of a 2003 power-sharing agreement, which stated that coalition members would attempt to reconcile policy differences in private before making them public. Baghdasarian evidently made no attempt to do so before the newspaper interviews appearance. Orinats Yerkir was created in 1998, thrusting Baghdasarian, who was at the time only 30 years old, into the center of Armenian political life. The party, with apparently strong backing from Kocharian and other top leaders, gained eight seats in the 1999 parliamentary vote, and went on to secure 20 in the 2003 elections.
Over the near term, experts in Yerevan believe few, if any policy changes will occur, as the government retains a solid majority in parliament. On some issues, including the political future of Nagorno-Karabakh, Orinats Yerkirs position remains closely aligned with those of the governing coalition, which also includes Markarians Republican Party and the Armenian Revolutionary Federation. [For background see the Eurasia Insight archive]. Following the 2003 parliamentary elections, Orinats Yerkir had the second largest parliamentary faction, and it received three ministerial portfolios under the power-sharing agreement. Amid Baghdasarians spat with other governing coalition leaders, the party experienced a considerable number of defections. The 10 lawmakers who left Orinats Yerkirs parliamentary faction have established themselves as independents, retaining a pro-government orientation. The party also lost three cabinet portfolios allocated to it under the 2003 power-sharing agreement.
Though currently operating in a severely weakened state, many observers expect Orinats Yerkir to quickly recover, and, ultimately, benefit from leaving the coalition. Re-casting itself as an opposition force will likely increase the partys competitiveness in the 2007 vote, analysts say. "It will be beneficial to create an image of a party that suffered due to the actions of authorities," said a commentary published by the Iravunk opposition weekly.
Iravunk went on to suggest Baghdasarian likely has his eye on the presidency, saying that he "may have good chances later to follow the path of Viktor Yushchenko and Mikheil Saakashvili, to make a turn from the ‘internal opposition of the authorities to an ‘orange opposition." But Baghdasarian has steadfastly sought to avoid comparisons with the leaders of the recent revolutions in Ukraine and neighboring Georgia. At a May 12 news conference, he did not seek to antagonize his erstwhile political allies, and insisted it was "too early" to discuss the possibility of his candidacy for the presidency.
Editor’s Note: Haroutiun Khachatrian is a Yerevan-based writer specializing in economic and political affairs.

Posted May 22, 2006 © Eurasianet
http://www.eurasianet.org
|
The Central Eurasia Project aims, through its website,
meetings, papers, and grants, to foster a more informed
debate about the social, political and economic
developments of the Caucasus and Central Asia.
It is a program of the Open Society
Institute-New York. The Open Society Institute-New
York is a private operating and grantmaking foundation
that promotes the development of open societies around
the world by supporting educational, social, and legal
reform, and by encouraging alternative
approaches to complex and controversial issues.
The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily
represent the position of the Open Society Institute and
are the sole responsibility of the author or
authors.
|
|