|
RESEARCHERS MIGHT HAVE UNCOVERED GHENGIS KHAN'S
GRAVE
Lucy Collins: 8/31/01
A EurasiaNet Partner Post from Transitions
Online
ULAANBAATAR, Mongolia--The joint Mongolian-American Genghis
Khan Geo-Historical Expedition undertaken in July has discovered
an ancient burial site 200 miles northeast of Ulaanbaatar
that may divulge clues as to the whereabouts of Genghis Khan’s
grave.
The burial site, located on Binder Mountain--part of the
Hentii mountain range in the Hentii region--is considered
an Ikhsiin Gazar (Grand Place), containing the graves
of up to 60 noble people. Researchers believe that the shapes,
location, and size of the graves indicate that they belong
to Mongolian kings and queens who lived in the Middle Ages.
There are several other factors that have led researchers
to believe that the site may lead to the discovery of the
grave of Genghis Khan: The proximity of the Grand Place to
Genghis Khan’s birthplace in 1162 and the fact that his father
is buried nearby are all strong clues suggesting his body
was returned here after he died in the Lu-Pan Mountains in
China in 1227.
The book, The Secret History of the Mongols--written in the
13th Century by an unknown author--is considered the most
comprehensive account of Mongolian history by scholars and
asserts that Genghis Khan’s body was returned to the Hentii
region.
Professor D. Bazargur of the Mongolian Academy of Sciences
said that the grave of Genghis Khan, who was declared leader
of the Mongols in 1206, could well be enshrined at the Grand
Place, perhaps next to his father’s grave. Also, the Burkhan
Haldun Mountain, part of the Hentii mountain range, is where
the famous ruler took retreat from other tribes when building
up his empire. The mountain is considered sacred and has been
venerated by Mongolians ever since.
According to Mongolian legend, the dead body of Genghis Khan
and his possessions were brought by 90 cattle-drawn carts
to nearby Bumbat hill and enshrined there. This may have been
a ploy to distract onlookers from the transportation of the
real body to the Grand Place on Binder Mountain. Legend also
has it that the "Graves of 100 Warriors" on the bank of the
Onon River, located east of Binder Mountain, contain the bodies
of the 50 gravediggers who buried Genghis Khan. Supposedly,
the gravediggers were killed by 50 warriors so as to ensure
the burial site was kept secret. The 50 warriors who murdered
the gravediggers were also killed.
Members of the expedition will request official state protection
of the area and continue their research in the hope of finding
the grave. They may face opposition from ordinary Mongolians,
many of whom hold the traditional shamanist belief that to
disturb the body of the deceased will destroy their soul.
Mongolian expedition member L. Orgil said that the discovery
of Genghis Khan’s burial site would "be very important
not only for Mongolian history but the history of the world."
The above story is reposted with permission from Transitions
Online (TOL). TOL (http://www.tol.cz)
is an Internet magazine covering Central and Eastern Europe,
the Balkans, and the former Soviet Union. If you aren't already
a member, you can fill out the registration form at <http://www.tol.cz/trialsubscr.html>
to receive a free two-month trial membership. If you're a
citizen of a post-communist country, FREE annual memberships
are available at <http://www.tol.cz/trialsubscr2.html>.
Email this article
Posted Augugst 31,
2001 © Eurasianet
http://www.eurasianet.org
 |
 |
The Central Eurasia Project aims, through its website,
meetings, papers, and grants, to foster a more informed
debate about the social, political and economic developments
of the Caucasus and Central Asia. It is a program of the
Open Society Institute-New York. The Open Society Institute-New
York is a private operating and grantmaking foundation
that promotes the development of open societies around
the world by supporting educational, social, and legal
reform, and by encouraging alternative approaches to complex
and controversial issues.
The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily
represent the position of the Open Society Institute and
are the sole responsibility of the author or authors.
|
 |
 |
|