EurasiaNet Eurasia Insight - Georgia: NATO Chief's Visit Encourages Membership "Dream"

EURASIA INSIGHT

GEORGIA: NATO CHIEF’S VISIT ENCOURAGES MEMBERSHIP "DREAM"
Molly Corso and Nina Akhmeteli 10/05/07

A two-day visit to Georgia by North Atlantic Treaty Organization Secretary Gen. Jaap de Hoop Scheffer has reinforced local ambitions for eventual membership in the Western military alliance, even while the alliance highlights particular reform areas of concern.

De Hoop Scheffer began his visit October 3, meeting with President Mikheil Saakashvili and other top government officials, delivering a speech at Tbilisi State University and appearing at a joint press conference with the Georgian president in Sighnaghi, a town in Georgia’s wine region heavily promoted by the government. [For background see the Eurasia Insight archive].

"NATO’s door was open, and is open," de Hoop Scheffer announced at the October 4 press conference. The secretary general, however, pointed out that Tbilisi’s membership chances depend solely on Georgia’s reform performance, and not on the actions of other countries. "No nation, big or small, will have a veto or a ’droit de regard,’ to say it in French, over NATO’s enlargement process," the NATO chief said.

De Hoop Scheffer cast his visit as a "sign of encouragement" for Georgia to press ahead with reforms. "NATO will help Georgia wherever it is necessary to see that Georgia can reach its ambitions and can reach its goal," he said. At the event, Saakashvili did not speak about his country’s NATO aspirations.

According to Georgian officials and local analysts, de Hoop Scheffer’s trip is a "positive signal" for Georgia’s eventual accession to the alliance. Elene Khoshtaria, the deputy state minister for European and Euro-Atlantic Integration, stressed that de Hoop Scheffer’s trip came at NATO’s initiative.

"I cannot say that it [the visit] gives any specific signal on a MAP [Membership Action Plan, which is the last step before a possible membership invitation -- ed], but it is very good political support, and, of course, on the road to a MAP every single political signal, political support is important," she said.

Dr. Archil Gegeshidze, a political scholar at the Georgian Foundation for Strategic and International Studies, noted that Georgia’s MAP status has more to do with the ministerial meetings planned between NATO and Tbilisi over the next several months. "There are lots of things to be further clarified," he said.

Among them is Georgia’s progress in several reform areas. Defense and security are not the only sectors in which NATO is interested. The NATO chief pointed out that judicial reform is another sphere that is attracting the scrutiny of Brussels. "When assessing progress in Georgia, NATO has looked, and will continue to look, at the whole reform picture, and not just the military dimension," he said. In an earlier appearance at Tbilisi State University, De Hoop Scheffer indicated that the country’s administration of its military budget and the 2008 presidential and parliamentary elections are also among topics of interest for the NATO allies.

The Georgian parliament approved a budget increase last month that allocated over 7 percent of the Gross National Product, or roughly $723 million, to the Defense Ministry. [For background see the Eurasia Insight archive].

De Hoop Scheffer adopted a restrained approach on the matter of conflict resolution in the breakaway regions of Abkhazia and South Ossetia. [For background see the Eurasia Insight archive]. While repeating the alliance’s support for Georgia’s territorial integrity, the NATO head stressed that "the mandate and expertise to try and resolve the conflicts in this region rest with the OSCE [Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe] and the UN [United Nations], not with NATO. And the Alliance does not seek stronger involvement."

Local and international analysts have long pointed to weak judicial and legal reforms as obstacles that could prevent Georgia’s membership in the alliance. According to NATO expert Shalva Pichkhadze, chairman of the lobbying organization Georgia for NATO, the Georgian government has been betting on NATO’s political motivations for accepting the country as a member, rather than on having a pristine reform record.

Pichkhadze points to the "lack of the necessary level of democracy," as well as violations against human rights, property rights and no historical tradition of peaceful power transitions as real obstacles to Georgia’s NATO accession. "[T]oo much attention," he argued, is being paid to military reforms, and not enough on democratic reforms.

"[Government officials] want to make more emphasis on so-called �political expediency.’ They say �No, the West is ready,’ and when they [say] �West’ they mean, first of all, the United States. They are ready to close their eyes to some misdoings or the lack of democracy," he said, referring to US policymakers. "NATO membership is not only about America, it is about European members as well�they are less toler[ant about] what happens in Georgia."

NATO reaction to the recent arrest of former Defense Minister Irakli Okruashvili, a topic which has mobilized Georgia’s fragmented opposition, were not addressed at the news conference, which was limited to three questions. [For background see the Eurasia Insight archive].

Khoshtaria, the deputy state minister for European and Euro-Atlantic integration, maintains that all the assessments from NATO of Georgia’s performance in meeting its requirements have been "positive."

"We did not have any serious concern at this last assessment [last February] that could kind of block or stop or even slow down the accession process," she said.

An "update" of Georgia’s Individual Partnership Action Plan (IPAP), finished in early 2007, puts a "special stress" on rule of law, judiciary reforms, penitentiary reforms and military reforms, she said.

Pichkhadze argues that the update, which he terms "IPAP2," is intended to compensate for what he claims is Georgia’s alleged failure to fulfill its original IPAP, a necessary step before moving on to a MAP, the final step before potentially receiving a membership invitation. Khoshtaria, however, dismissed the notion that the IPAP update denoted NATO displeasure with Georgia’s reform process. "Informally," NATO is "quite happy," the state minister insisted.

Meanwhile, the government is concentrating on NATO promotion and educational outreach campaigns. With its generous budget, the Defense Ministry is now trying to boost popular support for the alliance via a new, privately owned television station called Sakartvelo (Georgia), and by financing NATO information centers.

The Defense Ministry pays for 10 hours of the station’s 18 hours of programming each day, with NATO featured as one of the station’s "central issues," said Sakartvelo program manager Goga Akhaladze. The government has little doubt of these measures’ success. "NATO integration is so deeply enshrined in our nature," said Khoshtaria. "It is a kind of dream, a driving force for this country."

Editor�s Note: Molly Corso and Nina Akhmeteli are both freelance reporters based in Tbilisi.

The Central Eurasia Project aims, through its website, meetings, papers, and grants, to foster a more informed debate about the social, political and economic developments of the Caucasus and Central Asia. It is a program of the Open Society Institute-New York. The Open Society Institute-New York is a private operating and grantmaking foundation that promotes the development of open societies around the world by supporting educational, social, and legal reform, and by encouraging alternative approaches to complex and controversial issues.

The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily represent the position of the Open Society Institute and are the sole responsibility of the author or authors.