EURASIA INSIGHT
Todd Diamond
10/10/01
Print this article
Email this article
While bombs continue to fall on Afghanistan, Central Asian states are trying to focus international attention on the regions future security. Regional leaders said during a recent United Nations conference that a well-coordinated international effort will be needed to successfully combat terrorism.
Delegates from more than 160 countries participated in the United Nations debate on combating terrorism from October 1-5. Central Asian representatives – including Afghanistans northern neighbors Tajikistan, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan – placed special emphasis on a future UN role in preventing international terrorism.
"The United Nations ... must play a key role in setting up a global system to counter this large-scale threat posed by international terrorism, said Tajikistans UN Ambassador Rashid Alimov.
Central Asian delegates attempted to foster debate about the post-Taliban order. Several speakers focused on the under-funded Terrorism Prevention Branch of the UN Office for Drug Control and Crime Prevention, which operates in Vienna. Uzbekistans UN envoy, Alisher Vohidov, said new funds should be made available so that the Vienna office could develop into an antiterrorism center. Such an office could "provide technical and consultative services to states, international and regional organizations to implement international instruments and decisions of the United Nations," Vohidov added.
Russia is supporting the creation of an international anti-terrorist center under UN auspices. A top Russian official suggested that an anti-terrorism center established by the Commonwealth of Independent States in Kyrgyzstan could serve as the hub of international security efforts.
Several regional organizations in Central Asia have made anti-terrorism initiatives a top priority. Those groups include the Shanghai Organization for Cooperation, the five-year-old regional alliance that includes China, Russia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan. Another regional organization intent on fighting terrorism-related activity, including drug trafficking, is GUUAM, comprising Georgia, Ukraine, Uzbekistan, Azerbaijan and Moldova.
During the UN debate on October 4, Azerbaijani Ambassador Yashar Aliyev, speaking for GUUAM, reiterated the organizations view. "There is a need for a proper anti-terrorist international institution … with the primary task to complement the individual efforts of States in combating international terrorism and to assist them in implementing relevant legal instruments in the most efficient manner."
Turkmenistan also supports an international coalition against terrorism, the countrys UN representative Aksoltan Ataeva said October 5. Meanwhile, Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister Javad Zarif took a more circumspect approach towards anti-terrorism efforts. While agreeing on the need to eradicate terrorism, he warned that "the response cannot be indiscriminate retribution, putting many innocent civilian lives at risk."
The UN General Assembly will continue deliberations on anti-terrorism issues October 15, when its committee on international law will reconsider an international convention for the suppression of acts of nuclear terrorism, backed by Russia. The Security Council may also debate a proposal by India for comprehensive convention on international terrorism. Some UN representatives expressed hope the UN will expedite these treaties, clearing the way for more difficult debates ahead.
Editor’s Note: Todd Diamond is a journalist who covers the United Nations.
Posted October 10, 2001 © Eurasianet
http://www.eurasianet.org
|
The Central Eurasia Project aims, through its website,
meetings, papers, and grants, to foster a more informed
debate about the social, political and economic
developments of the Caucasus and Central Asia.
It is a program of the Open Society
Institute-New York. The Open Society Institute-New
York is a private operating and grantmaking foundation
that promotes the development of open societies around
the world by supporting educational, social, and legal
reform, and by encouraging alternative
approaches to complex and controversial issues.
The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily
represent the position of the Open Society Institute and
are the sole responsibility of the author or
authors.
|
|