EurasiaNet Eurasia Insight - Tajik President Seemingly Keen to Foster Competitive Presidential Election

EURASIA INSIGHT

TAJIK PRESIDENT SEEMINGLY KEEN TO FOSTER COMPETITIVE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION
10/23/06

The decision of Tajikistan’s main opposition parties not to field candidates for the country’s presidential election has rendered the outcome of the November 6 vote a foregone conclusion. Even so, the election campaign is proving unusual because President Imomali Rahmonov, the man virtually assured of winning re-election, seems to be going to great lengths to create the appearance of a competitive vote.

Given Rahmonov’s existing stranglehold on power, the leaders of two of Tajikistan’s main opposition parties � the Islamic Renaissance Party (IRP) and the Democratic Party of Tajikistan and Socialist Party � opted not to challenge the president. [For background see the Eurasia Insight archive].

Explaining the IRP’s decision not to nominate a presidential candidate, the party’s new leader, Muhidden Kabiri, cited a desire not to damage Tajikistan’s international reputation. The IRP is Central Asia’s only officially recognized religious party. Although its platform is moderate, Kabiri said in late September that the party preferred to maintain a low profile because the region is grappling to contain Islamic radicalism. "We didn’t want to place our country and our party at the front line of criticism that Islamic movements are very active here," Kabiri told the Tajik Service of Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty. "We have once again sacrificed our rights so as not to block possible aid to Tajikistan." Meanwhile, the Democrats have been debilitated by internal strife and are ill-positioned to conduct a presidential campaign.

As a result, Rahmonov is left to face a group of political unknowns in the election. The campaign itself has generated little excitement, and there are concerns in governing-party circles that widespread apathy will prompt many would-be voters to stay at home on election day. It’s far from an ideal situation for a president who aspires to raise his international profile. Accordingly, Rahmonov in recent weeks has appeared eager to foster interest in the campaign. In comments broadcast on Tajik television October 23, Rahmonov urged a heavy turnout. "Tajikistan’s status in the world depends on the results of this election," he said.

At the outset of the campaign season, only three candidates, including Rahmonov, had been officially registered to run. Then, on October 11, two additional candidates were registered -- Abdukhalim Gafarov, the leader of a renegade wing of the Socialist Party, and the Agrarian Party’s Amir Karakulov � bringing to five the total number of those seeking the presidency.

Perhaps the oddest development in the campaign so far occurred on October 12, when the Democratic Party published two different newspapers with the same name � Adolat. The first Adolat edition was published by the Democratic Party wing headed by the jailed Mahmadruzi Iskandarov, who many international human rights groups consider to be a political prisoner. [For background see the Eurasia Insight archive]. The other Adolat edition was published by the "recently renewed" faction headed by Masud Sobirov.

In late September, the Tajik Justice Ministry recognized Sobirov as the Democrats’ rightful leader. The official recognition came after his followers convened a rump party congress to proclaim Sobirov as the party’s leader. On October 2, commenting on the Justice Ministry’s move, Rakhmatullo Valiev, an Iskandarov ally and the former acting chairman of the party, told local media outlets that "someone from �above’ did not like our decision to boycott the presidential election, and this someone decided to throw us out of the political struggle."

The publishers of both versions of Adolat denounced each other’s publications as illegal. Sobirov has signaled an intention to file suit against Iskandarov’s supporters to prohibit them from using either the party name, or its affiliated newspaper. Meanwhile, Rajabi Mirzo, editor in chief of the Iskandarov-oriented Adolat said in an interview published by the Asia Plus news agency that "the Justice Ministry acknowledged us [the printing body], and according to our charter, only we have all the rights to publish Adolat."

At the same rump congress that sanctioned Sobirov’s leadership, delegates appointed a new party editorial board, headed by Muhammadibragim Abdujabborov, a representative of Sobirov-led wing. The move would seem to give authorities the justification to shut the Mirzo-edited publication down. "If the publishing houses refuse to print �the genuine’ Adolat � we will continue to publish using office copying equipment," said Mirzo, who has edited the weekly newspaper over the last year.

A presidential hopeful from the Sobirov wing of the Democratic Party, Tabarali Ziyoyev, tried to gather enough signatures to be placed on the ballot. But, according to the Avesta news agency, Ziyoyev’s signature drive fell short.

The Central Eurasia Project aims, through its website, meetings, papers, and grants, to foster a more informed debate about the social, political and economic developments of the Caucasus and Central Asia. It is a program of the Open Society Institute-New York. The Open Society Institute-New York is a private operating and grantmaking foundation that promotes the development of open societies around the world by supporting educational, social, and legal reform, and by encouraging alternative approaches to complex and controversial issues.

The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily represent the position of the Open Society Institute and are the sole responsibility of the author or authors.