|
GEORGIAN ARMENIANS CALL FOR AUTONOMY
Dima bit-Suleiman: 2/27/02
A EurasiaNet Partner Post from Transitions
Online
Ethnic Armenians in a remote part of Georgia have been staging
protests, demanding autonomy. The demonstrations, which have
drawn an average of 1,000 ethnic Armenians onto the streets
every day, have been dismissed by politicians in Tbilisi,
the Georgian capital.
The region of Javakheti, which is mainly populated by ethnic
Armenians, has long been a world unto itself, but calls for
outright autonomy erupted on 15 February, when rumors spread
that the authorities in Tbilisi wanted to order out a garrison
of Russian troops and replace them with units of the Turkish
army. The rumors were denied by Tbilisi. In recent months,
Georgia has developed a regional anti-terrorist policy together
with Turkey and Azerbaijan, and Georgia's expressed desire
to join NATO has raised Armenians' fears of closer Georgian
ties with Turkey, a NATO member.
While the Armenians' historical fear of the Turks may have
sparked the demonstrations, poverty and concerns that Russian
troops may be asked to leave their base in the region's capital,
Akhalkalaki, provide fuel for their discontent.
Ervand Shiranian, head of the local government, argues that
"we want to control funds ourselves, as the central government
is not able to support the region." His view is echoed
by the protestors, who ask, "Why not give us autonomy
within the Georgian state so that we can deal with our problems
ourselves?"
While its residents do not say precisely how they would benefit
from autonomy, Javakheti is already economically isolated
from Georgia. This mountain region on the border with Armenia
has virtually no infrastructure and is connected to other
parts of Georgia by only two roads, both of which are virtually
destroyed. The region's electricity supply comes directly
from neighboring Armenia, and trade, either with Georgia or
with Turkey, which lies just 30 kilometers south of Akhalkalaki,
is limited. While officials in Tbilisi repeatedly say long-term
socioeconomic plans for Javakheti are in the pipeline, none
have ever been completed or acted on. [For
background see the Eurasia Insight archive].
The Russian base, therefore, is of major economic importance.
The base employs 1,500 local residents, and its expenditures
help keep the economy afloat. The local currencies are the
Russian ruble and the Armenian dram; the Georgian lari is
very rarely seen.
Above all, there are no Georgian troops in the region. For
security, the local Armenians instead look to the Russians,
whom they perceive as their only bulwark against Turkey. The
last time Georgian troops tried to enter the region, to hold
exercises in the summer of 1998, they were turned back by
a crowd blocking the road. Georgia's defense minister, Davit
Tevzadze, immediately ordered his troops to withdraw, to "avoid
armed conflict with local Armenians."
The Georgian administration of President Eduard Shevardnadze
has long pressed for the Russians to withdraw. Russia is now
pushing Georgia to grant it a 15-year lease on the base, in
return for reducing Georgia's gas debt to Russia, which currently
stands at more than $1.5 million. The Georgians have offered
a three-year lease, which was refused by the Russians. The
issue still has not been resolved. Russia currently has two
other bases in Georgia, in Batumi and Gudauta.
While the demonstrations have been discussed in the Georgian
parliament, little consideration is being given to the calls
for autonomy. Security Minister Valeri Khaburdzania described
the situation as "not very serious," while the head
of the nongovernmental Institute
for Peace, Democracy, and Development, Gia Nodia, said
the demands were economic in character rather than political.
In Nodia's view, autonomy is not a priority, but the "main
issues are socioeconomic problems, which they look at from
an ethnic angle. ... They simply don't know that there are
the same tough problems in Imereti or Samegrelo" in western
Georgia.
However, Guram Sharadze, a member of parliament known for
his nationalistic views, said that the tension in the region
is the result of a "wrong national policy. If we had
made Georgian a state language, there would be no problems
now."
Certainly, on the streets and in homes, there is little indication
that Javakheti is part of Georgia. Georgian is rarely heard
and is hardly taught in the schools. Most people watch Russian
or Armenian television. However, some of the demonstrators
argue that autonomy would strengthen, not weaken, Georgia.
"We want the authorities to give national minorities
back their identity, so they can defend Georgia's integrity
alongside [ethnic] Georgians," said one protestor.
For the time being, no politician in Tbilisi supports granting
Javakheti autonomy. Meanwhile, the region will continue to
enjoy de facto autonomy, and until the fate of the Russian
base is decided, the local population will remain ready to
come out onto the streets.
Email this article
Posted February 27,
2002 © Eurasianet
http://www.eurasianet.org
 |
 |
The Central Eurasia Project aims, through its website,
meetings, papers, and grants, to foster a more informed
debate about the social, political and economic developments
of the Caucasus and Central Asia. It is a program of the
Open Society Institute-New York. The Open Society Institute-New
York is a private operating and grantmaking foundation
that promotes the development of open societies around
the world by supporting educational, social, and legal
reform, and by encouraging alternative approaches to complex
and controversial issues.
The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily
represent the position of the Open Society Institute and
are the sole responsibility of the author or authors.
|
 |
 |
|