EURASIA INSIGHT
7/15/07
A EurasiaNet Partner Post from RFE/RL
Print this article
Email this article
Pro-Taliban militants in Pakistans restive North Waziristan tribal region say they are pulling out of a noninterference deal with the government that gave them wide latitude in exchange for security assurances.
The militants accuse Islamabad of violating the agreement by deploying more troops in the region.
The agreement drew intense scrutiny as critics and backers followed its course in hopes of learning lessons for how to combat lawlessness and militancy in areas where central governments have trouble establishing control.
The agreement was reached between the pro-Taliban militant leader and the government in Islamabad in September 2006.
The militants leadership council, or shura, made the announcement in a statement issued today in Miran Shah, the capital of North Waziristan.
The accord called for local residents to not give shelter to foreign militants and end cross-border attacks on coalition forces deployed in Afghanistan. It also urged militants to stop targeting Pakistani officials, as well as pro-government tribal elders, and journalists.
In return, Islamabad pledged to reduce the number of government troops stationed in the area and end ground and aerial operations in North Waziristan.
Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf has recently announced his commitment to eliminating "terrorism and extremism" all parts of the country, even as political tensions mounted.
Meanwhile, Islamic radicals and international terrorists urged sympathizers to fight the Pakistani government in the wake of the seige at the Red Mosque in Islamabad.
Posted July 15, 2007 © Eurasianet
http://www.eurasianet.org
|
The Central Eurasia Project aims, through its website,
meetings, papers, and grants, to foster a more informed
debate about the social, political and economic
developments of the Caucasus and Central Asia.
It is a program of the Open Society
Institute-New York. The Open Society Institute-New
York is a private operating and grantmaking foundation
that promotes the development of open societies around
the world by supporting educational, social, and legal
reform, and by encouraging alternative
approaches to complex and controversial issues.
The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily
represent the position of the Open Society Institute and
are the sole responsibility of the author or
authors.
|
|