EURASIA INSIGHT
Jonathan Alpeyrie
1/29/10
A EurasiaNet Slideshow
Print this article
Email this article
The Kintsvisi monastery is a place where the past manages to keep the present at bay. The monks who reside at this sanctuary, situated in the heavily wooded mountains of Georgias Shida Kartli region, live according to the same basic guidelines that were in place at the time of its founding more than a millennium ago.
Every Sunday, the monks rise at 3am for four hours of prayer in the monasterys main building. Surrounded by murals dating from the early 13th century, the monks pray with uncommon devotion.
The monastery has three churches that were constructed between the 10th and 13th centuries. The oldest structure, St. Marys, is in need of a thorough reconstruction. Even so, the Patriarchate of the Georgian Orthodox Church describes the monastery as "one of the most significant and valuable architectural monument[s] [dating from] the Middle Ages in Georgia."
To preserve an atmosphere of piety, the monks strive to maintain a firm, figurative wall separating the grounds from the outside, secularized world. But on some occasions, the outside intrudes upon the monasterys austere routine. The monastery is located not far from the separatist region of South Ossetia, and during the summer of 2008, hundreds of Georgian troops and civilians alike fled to the monastery in search of a safe haven from invading Russian troops. The area survived the fighting unscathed.
Posted January 29, 2010 © Eurasianet
http://www.eurasianet.org
|
The Central Eurasia Project aims, through its website,
meetings, papers, and grants, to foster a more informed
debate about the social, political and economic
developments of the Caucasus and Central Asia.
It is a program of the Open Society
Institute-New York. The Open Society Institute-New
York is a private operating and grantmaking foundation
that promotes the development of open societies around
the world by supporting educational, social, and legal
reform, and by encouraging alternative
approaches to complex and controversial issues.
The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily
represent the position of the Open Society Institute and
are the sole responsibility of the author or
authors.
|
|