EURASIA INSIGHT
Marianna Grigoryan
3/26/09
Print this article
Email this article
It is not just railways, energy and telecommunications that unite Russian and Armenian business interests. This summer, a controversial joint project to mine uranium is expected to break ground; a prospect that some Armenian environmentalists warn could turn Armenia into "an environmental disaster zone."
The project, launched in February 2008, means fuel for Armenias nuclear power plant and for export. Details about financing are sketchy, although Armenia and Russia were originally said to be equal partners in the venture. Russias atomic energy agency, Rosatom, has claimed that it will put in "several million dollars" for research up until 2010. But the joint enterprise handling the project cannot elaborate.
Exploration began last fall in the southern region of Syunik, known for its metal ore riches. The project has so far relied primarily on Soviet-era data. Rosatom Senior Director Sergei Kirienko projected in 2008 that the sites could contain "up to 60,000 tons" of uranium ore.
Academician and geochemist Sergei Grigorian, who oversees the geological survey of the Syunik uranium deposits, told EurasiaNet it is still too soon to speak about exact figures concerning the deposits. The work, though, he affirmed, "is on the right track."
"I personally suspended exploration work [at this same location] during the Soviet era, because I believed the exploitation of uranium mines [in Armenia] was senseless since there were larger deposits in other Soviet republics," said Grigorian. "But today, when uranium costs up to $300 per kilogram, exploitation of the [Armenian] deposits will bring benefits, if the ore is used carefully."
The director of the joint company set up to oversee the project, the Armenian-Russian Mining Company, adds that for the next two years the focus will be on geological surveys alone.
"We cant tell the exact amount of available deposits, but the extraction will cover quite a large territory in both the northern and the southern regions of Syunik," said director Mkrtich Kirakosian. The start of underground survey work, originally expected for this spring, "might be somewhat delayed" some months as the project waits for government authorization for the work, he added.
Despite the lack of specifics, environmentalists are already issuing dire warnings. Syunik already is home to the copper mining works of Kapan and Kajaran. Inga Zarafian, chairman of the non-governmental organization Ecolur, said that opening a uranium mine in the area would greatly increase the ecological hazards.
Traces of heavy metals such as mercury and arsenic have already been found in the hair of children living near what is expected to be the uranium projects primary mining site, Lernadzor, some three kilometers away from Kajaran. Surveys by the Armenian National Academy of Sciences Ecosphere Research Center show that ground radiation in the area exceeds the permitted level by more than three and a half times; ground contamination by heavy metals is several times higher than allowed.
Given the risks, public discussions on the mining project are a must, Zafarian affirms. "Talking about this tomorrow may be too late," Zarafian said. "The territories are already environmentally endangered. . . . Now, they are going to exploit uranium mines there. Imagine whats going happen to the place!"
Lernadzor village head Stepan Poghosian says that locals are worried about the health risks once actual mining begins. "Everybody knows what uranium is. . . . People dont want to live in a place that may cause diseases in their children," Poghosian said. "The exploitation of uranium is not rain, a mudslide or hail, things that villagers can handle."
Both experts involved in the survey work and the Ministry of Environmental Protection insist that the project involves no hazards, and that mining operations will be "transparent."
The uranium deposits are mostly hidden within the grounds crust and will be extracted via tunneling, said survey overseer Grigorian, who seconds the call for a public hearing on the matter. "The mining might be dangerous if it were, say, in the basin of Lake Sevan, but there is no such danger because Syunik is a mountainous region," said Grigorian. "Maybe a very small area is threatened there, at the entrance to the tunnel, but the rest of the work will be done underground. So, the populations fears of radiation are groundless."
Armenian-Russian Mining Company Director Kirakosian echoes that line. "Its too soon to talk about environmental problems because, so far, its just about the survey," he said, adding that all work follows existing legislation and "observes all environmental requirements."
Environmentalist Hakob Sanasarian, chairman of the Greens Union of Armenia, counters that uranium prospecting at the Syunik site was stopped for a good reason during the Soviet era. "The suspension . . . was not a decision that just happened," Sanasarian said. Grigorian, who worked on the site in Soviet times, however, maintains that the work stopped only because other sites had larger deposits. "The environmental hazards threaten to cause genetic modifications in humans, as well as cancer, and other defects. Nature will have its revenge one day."
Meanwhile, local residents say they are left in a quandary about whether to go or to stay. "I dont know what is going to happen," said Lernadzors Petrosian. "We have lived here our whole lives . . ."
Editor's Note: Marianna Grigoryan is a freelance reporter based in Yerevan.
Posted March 26, 2009 © Eurasianet
http://www.eurasianet.org
|
The Central Eurasia Project aims, through its website,
meetings, papers, and grants, to foster a more informed
debate about the social, political and economic
developments of the Caucasus and Central Asia.
It is a program of the Open Society
Institute-New York. The Open Society Institute-New
York is a private operating and grantmaking foundation
that promotes the development of open societies around
the world by supporting educational, social, and legal
reform, and by encouraging alternative
approaches to complex and controversial issues.
The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily
represent the position of the Open Society Institute and
are the sole responsibility of the author or
authors.
|
|