NEWS BRIEFS
2/18/09
Print this article
Email this article
Turkmen gas could be heading for Europe as soon as 2014, but not along a trans-Caspian route. Instead it could be pumped to Turkey via Iran, according to an Iranian newspaper report.
The Iran Daily reported February 18 that Tehran seeks to become a gas transit hub and energy exporter to Europe. Those aims received a boost from a February 14 agreement under which Ashgabat agreed to export an additional 10 billion cubic meters (bcm) of Turkmen gas to Iran. The two countries also agreed in principle on a joint-development project in the Yoloten gas field in south-eastern Turkmenistan. [For background see the Eurasia Insight archive].
The head of the National Iranian Gas Export Company, Reza Kasaeizadeh, said a "Persian Pipeline" could rival the proposed Nabucco project. This rival route would rely on exiting infrastructure to transport gas as far as the Turkish border. Kasaeizadeh added that Iranian officials were seeking the support of European Union member for the plan. The proposed Iranian export route has a current capacity of 40 bcm annually. Nabucco, as currently envisioned, would be able to provide 31 bcm of gas to Europe every year.
Iran itself possesses reserves that could make it a formidable exporter. Some plans call for Iran to boost domestic production to 465 bcm by 2020. The countrys economic difficulties, as well as problems accessing international credit markets, could prevent Tehran from realizing its aims.
Posted February 18, 2009 © Eurasianet
http://www.eurasianet.org
|
The Central Eurasia Project aims, through its website,
meetings, papers, and grants, to foster a more informed
debate about the social, political and economic
developments of the Caucasus and Central Asia.
It is a program of the Open Society
Institute-New York. The Open Society Institute-New
York is a private operating and grantmaking foundation
that promotes the development of open societies around
the world by supporting educational, social, and legal
reform, and by encouraging alternative
approaches to complex and controversial issues.
The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily
represent the position of the Open Society Institute and
are the sole responsibility of the author or
authors.
|
|