|
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
| |
 |
| PHOTO ESSAYS |
 |
|
|
 |
| CARTOON DISPATCH |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
 |
NEWS BRIEFS
7/13/09
Print this article
Email this article
Azerbaijan reiterated its commitment to the Nabucco gas pipeline project on July 13 as Turkey and four European Union members sealed a deal that will allow the much-awaited pipeline to pass through their territories. Speaking at a summit in Ankara, Azerbaijani Minister of Industry and Energy Natig Aliyev said that Baku is interested in developing the Nabucco transportation corridor to export Azerbaijans hydrocarbons to Europe, but added that his country is committed to other export directions such as Russia, APA news agency reported. The Nabucco project, promoted heavily by Washington and the EU, is essentially meant to reduce Russias stranglehold on natural gas exports to Europe. Azerbaijans commitment to the project is vital, as other prospective suppliers -- Turkmenistan and Kazakhstan -- remain noncommittal about the project. Azerbaijani media claimed that the intergovernmental agreement signed by Turkey, Bulgaria, Romania and Hungary allegedly gave an edge to Nabucco against the Russian-proposed alternative, South Stream, but questions about Nabucco linger on. Ankaras push to include Iran as a supplier is unlikely to go down well with Washington. Meanwhile, arguments about transit terms have again surfaced between Turkey and other Nabucco stakeholders.
Posted July 13, 2009 © Eurasianet
http://www.eurasianet.org
|
The Central Eurasia Project aims, through its website,
meetings, papers, and grants, to foster a more informed
debate about the social, political and economic
developments of the Caucasus and Central Asia.
It is a program of the Open Society
Institute-New York. The Open Society Institute-New
York is a private operating and grantmaking foundation
that promotes the development of open societies around
the world by supporting educational, social, and legal
reform, and by encouraging alternative
approaches to complex and controversial issues.
The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily
represent the position of the Open Society Institute and
are the sole responsibility of the author or
authors.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |