A VILLAGE’S UNREST REFLECTS UNRESOLVED WOES IN AZERBAIJAN
Hooman Peimami: 3/04/03

An uneasy calm has returned to the Azerbaijani village of Nardaran, site of a riot last June that left at least one dead and dozens injured. On March 3, a local court handed suspended sentences to eight men detained for allegedly encouraging the disturbances in the village. The court’s decision suggests that the government is anxious to ease tension in an area where social and economic discontent is rife.

A confrontational mood has hovered over Nardaran, a village noted for having many devout Muslim residents, since the June 3 riot. [For background see the Eurasia Insight archives]. The situation is such that law enforcement personnel established check points to control movement into and out of the village, about 19 miles northwest of Baku.

Officials have maintained that the Nardaran tension is being provoked by Islamic radicals. Baku has also claimed that Iran was involved in inciting the riot. An official from the prosecutor-general’s office, in an interview broadcast in February by Baku’s ANS television, said that searches of Nardaran residents had produces unauthorized weapons and Iranian banknotes. An Iranian diplomat in Baku flatly denied any link between Tehran and the Nardaran riot, the according to the ANS report.

Worsening economic and social conditions in the village made the largest contribution to the outbreak of unrest in Nardaran, political analysts contend. They note that, prior to the riot, Nardaran had staged several demonstrations seeking improvements in the village’s socio-economic infrastructure.

Tension threatened to again lead to violence February 5, when Interior Ministry security agents conducted another raid, during which several people were reportedly injured, according to witnesses. Authorities also detained at least eight village leaders during the operation. On February 10, a go-between – the chairman of the Spiritual Board of Muslims of the Caucasus, Haji Allahshukur Pashazade – brokered an agreement that reestablished an uneasy truce.

Interior Minister Ramil Usubov told reporters on February 11: "We believe that the talks conducted will yield positive results. Order has not been disrupted in the village as was the case before."

The Vienna-based International Helsinki Federation for Human Rights and the Baku-based Human Rights Center of Azerbaijan identify Nardaran residents’ unresolved socio-economic problems as the main source of tension. In a joint statement February 6, these two groups condemned the raid and demanded a "thorough and impartial" investigation into the case. They also demanded the release of all Nardaran residents held by the Azeri authorities without being charged or their trial by an "impartial and competent tribunal."

The suspended sentences appear to be the government’s attempt at defusing existing tension. President Heidar Aliyev, according to media reports, personally authorized the February 10 negotiations. Despite the latest developments, however, many Nardaran residents arrested in connection with the June 3 riot remain in detention without being charged, according to human rights activists.

Some of the villagers’ complaints are grounded in their Islamic beliefs. For example, residents complained about an unpopular local official’s consumption of alcohol. But larger factors in Nardaran’s discontent stem from chronic shortages of gas and electricity. The government’s most recent steps appear to tacitly recognize the economic antecedents of the tension. Yet, given that the government has yet to address those root socio-economic causes, political analysts believe that another flare-up in tension is possible.

Editor’s Note: Dr. Hooman Peimani researches international relations and works as an independent consultant with international organizations in Geneva.

Email this article | Printer-Friendly Version
Posted March 4, 2003 © Eurasianet
http://www.eurasianet.org

	The Central Eurasia Project aims, through its website, meetings, papers, and grants, to foster a more informed debate about the social, political and economic developments of the Caucasus and Central Asia. It is a program of the Open Society Institute-New York. The Open Society Institute-New York is a private operating and grantmaking foundation that promotes the development of open societies around the world by supporting educational, social, and legal reform, and by encouraging alternative approaches to complex and controversial issues. The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily represent the position of the Open Society Institute and are the sole responsibility of the author or authors.