Defiant Iranian
Journalist Akbar Ganji Speaks Out
Afshin Molavi: 12/12/00
With his bright, dancing eyes and easy smile, Akbar Ganji
does not look like a man holding dark secrets of political
assassination and government-sponsored violence. The 40 year-old
journalist, however, has spent the last few months in jail
for exposing some of those secrets. Last week, facing charges
of treason before a hard-line judge in a Tehran court, he
defiantly attacked his accusers and boldly named senior clerics
he says were involved in a spate of political assassinations
in late 1998. Ganji's revelations rocked Tehran political
circles and increased his popularity across Iran to even higher
levels. Previously, he declined to name names, referring to
the implicated senior officials as "grey monsignors." Last
week, in the spotlight of his high-profile trial, he fingered
former Minister of Intelligence Ali Fallahian, hard-line judge
Mohseni Ejei, and senior cleric Ayatollah Mesbah Yazdi as
the instigators of the assassinations of 5 dissidents and
writers in 1998, and up to 80 others since the late 1980's.
It is unlikely that any serious investigation will be launched
against accused high level figures because Iran's security
service and judiciary are dominated by conservatives. Still,
Ganji's bold pronouncements are likely to add fuel to the
reformist-conservative power struggle that has been raging
since the election of President Mohammad Khatami in May, 1997.
Ganji, with his fearless reporting and vocal criticism of
Iran's powerful conservatives, has become a leading voice
in Iran's nascent pro-democracy movement. He is widely believed
to have eclipsed in popularity all other reformist figures,
including President Mohammad Khatami, who calls for a more
cautious approach. Ganji has also become a leading target
of anti-reform conservatives, who still control key levers
of power, including all security agencies. They call Ganji
"a traitor" and the diminutive journalist regularly receives
death threats. He has also reportedly been beaten during his
latest incarceration.
Still, with each report of death threats or prison beatings
and each defiant verbal counter-attack by the journalist,
Ganji’s legend grows. He is the darling of pro-democracy Iranian
students and a growing number of Iran's frustrated reformers,
many of whom are beginning to fear that President Khatami
is moving too slowly and ceding too much ground to conservatives.
Shortly before his incarceration, Ganji spoke with the Central
Eurasia Group in a basement of a downtown Tehran apartment
building. When asked if he feared for his life, Ganji said:
"Democratization has costs that I am willing to bear. I am
simply seeking the truth so we can eliminate the use of politically-inspired
violence in our society. I am not looking to become a martyr
or hero."
Ganji's philosophy is simple: "In order to find the truth,
we must ask difficult questions," he said in the interview.
"That's it. Some people say that it is not expedient to ask
these questions now. I think that the questions might save
people's lives in the future and force a certain amount of
accountability on officials who have previously worked behind
the scenes and paid no consequences for their illegal actions.
Without asking these questions, we will not progress."
Ganji calls himself a religious intellectual, though he quotes
primarily secular Western thinkers. He feels that Iran's conservative
clerics "have turned religion into ideology and have reduced
faith into fascism." In the interview, he went on to say:
"This is nothing new. Every religion has had its dark moments
with inquisitions and narrow-minded prejudice, but this moment
we have had in Iran goes against the spirit of Islam and all
major faiths."
He views Iran's 1979 revolution as a popular outcry for freedom
that turned away from the will of the people and toward an
authoritarian system that abused religious belief. "Instead
of a more democratic society, we got religious fascism," he
said, repeating an argument he has made in his books and newspaper
articles.
"Most religious intellectuals, like myself, believe that
we must embrace the principles of political modernity - civil
society, free press, democracy, rule of law. These are principles
of secularization. Most of us, the religious intellectuals,
believe in a Popperian view of the world." The 20th century
Austrian philosopher Karl Popper, author of the landmark political
study Open Society and its Enemies, is a favorite of
Iran's reformists, including President Khatami. In the book,
Popper defends democratic liberalism and a makes a devastating
critique of the philosophic underpinnings of totalitarian
systems. He goes on to describe how Marxism, an initially
scientific theory, should have failed under the weight of
empirical evidence, but instead degenerated into pseudo-scientific
dogma in the defense of totalitarianism.
Ganji draws parallels between Popper's view of Marxist history
and the evolution of Iran's Islamic government. "In a sense,
that is what happened with our Islamic revolution," he said
"We had a theory - that Islamic government could provide us
with just rule - but then there was a great deal of pseudo-Islamic
dogma added in defense of totalitarianism."
Ganji said that he hopes his efforts would result in "a civil
society free of political violence and a government that respects
religion and does not abuse it." He declined to comment on
his views on the separation of religion and state. Privately,
many reformers like Ganji feel that the time has come for
Iran to wean itself away from the prominent role of religion
in government, though this idea is still too dangerous to
broach publicly.
He also hopes to show a more gentle interpretation of Islam,
as opposed to the view favored by Iran's conservatives which,
he says, goes against the peaceful nature of the faith. "They
promise you heaven but they create hell on earth," he said,
repeating one of his best known sayings.
As the journalist faces an uncertain future in a Tehran prison
cell, his aides said on Monday that Ganji is unlikely to let
up on his attacks. They admit to fearing the consequences
of his defiant stand, including a possible assassination.
Iran's conservatives, however, understand the importance of
Ganji’s public influence and might not want to risk a dramatic
popular backlash at a time when their own popularity is at
a nadir.
Editor's Note: Afshin Molavi is a journalist based
in Tehran, Iran. His work has appeared in the Washington Post.
Email
this article
Posted December 12, 2000 © Eurasianet
http://www.eurasianet.org
 |
 |
The Central Eurasia Project aims, through its website,
meetings, papers, and grants, to foster a more informed
debate about the social, politcal and economic developments
of the Caucasus and Central Asia. It is a program of the
Open Society Institute-New York. The Open Society Institute-New
York is a private operating and grantmaking foundation
that promotes the development of open societies around
the world by supporting educational, social, and legal
reform, and by encouraging alternative approaches to complex
and controversial issues.
The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily
represent the position of the Open Society Institute
and are the sole responsibility of the author or authors.
|
 |
 |
|