|
KAZAKH GOVERNMENT CLAMPS DOWN ON INDEPENDENT
MEDIA
Antoine Blua: 3/9/02
A EurasiaNet Partner Post from RFE/RL
This week's suspensions of an independent news weekly and
a television station in the Kazakh capital have brought attention
back to the issue of press freedom in Kazakhstan.
The Almaty-based "Nachnem s Ponedelnika" weekly was handed
a three-month suspension on 6 March for what claimants call
"technical reasons."
The weekly's editor, Mertai Aqsholaqov, explained: "The Bostandyq
district court of Almaty made this decision, as they say,
due to technical reasons, and the failure of the weekly to
show its proper address and the exact number of copies issued
weekly. Today we received an official letter from the publishing
house saying that it refuses to print our product."
But Aqsholaqov said he believes the decision to issue the
suspension is politically motivated. On 1 March, "Nachnem
s Ponedelnika" held a public interview with Akezhan Kazhegeldin
-- the former Kazakh prime minister and a major political
opponent to Kazakh President Nursultan Nazarbaev.
Kazhegeldin, who is currently living in exile and last year
was convicted in absentia on charges of corruption and tax
evasion, said during the interview he may return to Kazakhstan
in the near future. Some say granting a public forum to one
of Nazarbaev's most prominent rivals may be the real reason
behind the weekly's suspension.
On 4 March, the Kazakh government issued a six-month broadcasting
suspension to the Almaty-based TAN-TV company. Its license
was suspended for a number of procedural violations including
use of a faulty transmitter, improper registration of equipment,
and poor sanitary working conditions.
But TAN-TV employees say their shutdown is also politically
motivated. The company receives financial support from another
opposition figure: Mukhtar Abliyazov of the Democratic Choice
of Kazakhstan movement and a former minister of trade, energy,
and economy.
TAN-TV may also have drawn government ire for broadcasting
a January gathering of opposition political parties and local
non-governmental organizations (NGO). For five hours, television
viewers were exposed to wide-ranging criticism of government
policy.
Some international organizations consider the week's developments
part of a wider clampdown by Nazarbaev on domestic media.
Internews Kazakhstan is part of the Internews International
Network, an NGO that promotes the development of independent
television and radio in emerging democracies. Internews employee
Svetlana Dylevskaya told RFE/RL that her organization has
voiced "serious" concern regarding "numerous incidents" restricting
the freedom of activity of independent and private mass media
in Kazakhstan.
Dylevskaya said the Kazakh government in February recalled
broadcasting licenses for six television companies (Irbis,
STS, Alfa, Channel 43, Channel 29, and TKT). In each case,
the state cited violations of Kazakhstan's language and mass
media laws. Dylevskaya said, however, that many press observers
claim such technical violations are only used as a pretext.
"In each individual case, authorities use various arguments
and accuse broadcasters of violating Kazakh legislation. However,
journalists and owners of closed stations, media experts,
and opposition figures in the country all claim in their speeches
that in reality, a campaign of political persecution of media,
which to some extent report on democratic opposition in their
information programs, was launched in the country," Dylevskaya
said. "In addition, decisions of various bodies are being
officially used for closing stations, including judicial bodies."
Dylevskaya added that Internews Kazakhstan is also concerned
by the government's crackdown on the independent press.
"From the beginning of the year, newspapers containing critical
articles regarding the government have had serious problems,"
Dylevskaya said. "Publishing houses under the control of the
authorities refuse to print newspapers like 'Respublika-delovoye
obozreniye,' 'Vremya po -- The Globe" and 'SolDat.'"
Dylevskaya said journalists from a number of the suspended
television companies and print publications have appealed
to the Kazakh parliament, as well as to international organizations,
to protect them from state crackdowns.
In an address to parliament in early March, journalists from
"Irbis" -- a TV channel broadcasting in North Kazakhstan that
was among those suspended last month -- said that executive
authorities, particularly those in the regions, have been
"dictating conditions" for the mass media, introducing censorship,
and limiting journalists' ability to receive information.
In a letter addressed to U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell,
Ermurat Bapi, the editor in chief of the "SolDat" opposition
newspaper, appealed to Washington to expedite the creation
of an independent publishing house in Kazakhstan.
Marilyn Greene is the executive director of the U.S.-based
World Press Freedom Committee (WPFC). She said the problem
of mass media in Kazakhstan is the "permissive spirit of restriction."
"There is a very limited amount of freedom to comment freely
about the government and about the policies there. One of
the big problems we see in Kazakhstan is with the law, one
of which forbids any kind of comment that could be seen as
critical of the president," Greene said. "In order to avoid
punishment under this law, many journalists simply don't approach
that topic. And so we see self-censorship and we see a lack
of full disclosure or full discussion of issues that are relevant
to the public's future and policies."
Among the most frequently used justifications for restricting
the media, Greene said, are charges of insulting the dignity
of public officials and endangering national security. She
added that the WPFC is most concerned about one particular
article frequently invoked by officials to prevent criticism.
"It's [the law] even embodied in the constitution of the
country in Article 18, which says everyone should have the
right to private life, personal or family secrets, and the
protection of honor and dignity," Greene said. "This is a
very broad brush which can be used by public officials to
prevent any kind of scrutiny of their actions, policies, or
activities. And then Article 46 of the constitution is the
one that specifically protects the president and his honor
and dignity."
According to international organizations, the campaign against
independent media in Kazakhstan has recently intensified.
The Vienna-based International Press Institute, in its annual
World Press Freedom Review released in late February, said
the Kazakh press is largely controlled by the government and
the situation is worsening. It added the government is expanding
its use of the courts to persecute critical media.
The month before, Kazakhstan's president ordered a crackdown
on his growing opposition, prompting fears that the country's
independent TV stations could be shut down. After opposition
protests were held demanding new elections, Nazarbaev warned
they could lead to civil war. At a special cabinet meeting,
he then ordered prosecutors to investigate "statements by
politicians and the press over the past three months and hold
them responsible."
In a statement made public on 1 February, four parliament
deputies condemned Nazarbaev's instructions to bring to trial
all persons who have criticized the president and his family.
They describe those orders as being "in the best traditions
of 1937," the year of one of Josef Stalin's most notorious
purges.
Nazarbaev also ordered the Prosecutor-General's Office to
look into how well the republic's television stations are
complying with a law that took effect on 1 January requiring
50 percent of prime-time programming to be in the Kazakh language.
Television officials strongly protest this law because of
the expense of translating programs and fears they will alienate
many viewers. Russian is the primary language for many people
in Kazakhstan, where a significant Russian minority still
remains.
Few television stations have complied with the new law, but
independent journalist Sergei Duvanov recently declared that
sanctions are being applied "selectively," tending to come
down on independent stations that broadcast programs critical
of Nazarbaev's regime.
Email this article
Posted March 9, 2002 © Eurasianet
http://www.eurasianet.org
 |
 |
The Central Eurasia Project aims, through its website, meetings,
papers, and grants, to foster a more informed debate about
the social, politcal and economic developments of the Caucasus
and Central Asia. It is a program of the Open Society Institute-New
York. The Open Society Institute-New York is a private operating
and grantmaking foundation that promotes the development
of open societies around the world by supporting educational,
social, and legal reform, and by encouraging alternative
approaches to complex and controversial issues.
The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily
represent the position of the Open Society Institute and
are the sole responsibility of the author or authors.
|
 |
 |
|