Glimpses from
Behind the Veil: Two Female Perspectives on Iranian Society
Today
Elizabeth Kiem: 1/24/01
 |
Neither East Nor West : One Woman's Journey Through
the Islamic Republic of Iran
by Christiane Bird
Hardcover - 464 pages (March 2001)
Pocket Books; ISBN: 0671027557
|
 |
Persian Mirrors : The Elusive Face of Iran
by Elaine Sciolino
Hardcover - 402 pages (October 2000)
Free Press; ISBN: 0684862905
|
When a political shift in Tehran placed a reform-minded cleric
at the head of the Islamic Republic, the United States eased
sanctions, toned down official rhetoric, and offered the coolest
of overtures to its erstwhile enemy. This diplomatic thaw
has helped to dispel many of the erroneous stereotypes propagated
by the respective governments. Yet fundamental barriers still
remain.
Emblematic of that cultural divide, and symbolic of the mystery
that Iran poses for the West, is the chador. It is
difficult for Western eyes to see anything but repression
in the heavy black covering worn by most Iranian women outside
Tehran. Visually, it reinforces the belief that Islam denies
women individuality. Textually, the Koran’s emphasis on female
purity smacks of sexism. Interestingly, the authors of two
recent portraits of Iran today are Western women, journalists
both, who found their sex to be an advantage in understanding
the society as foreigners.
Christiane Bird is a veteran travel-writer who spent a few
years in Tabriz as a child, and set out for a second visit
in 1998 armed with elementary Persian and a list of contacts.
The Iran she returns to scarcely resembles her childhood memories,
but captivates her entirely. Through myriad indirect acquaintances,
she gains broad access to Iranian society. Her ability to
keep an open mind allows her access and insights into the
nuances of Iran that confound so many in the West. The mandated
attire, which at first bedevils and angers her, becomes understandable
and even sensible to her after months in company with women
who take the dress code for granted.
Neither East Nor West is fascinating in its anecdotal
content, if uninspired in its chronological narration, evidence
that a great traveler does not a great travel-writer make.
Still, Bird’s viewpoint is an interesting complement to the
more studied account of Iran published late last year by New
York Times correspondent Elaine Sciolino.
Sciolino, who has covered Iran since the 1979 revolution,
counters the conventional wisdom about Iranian women with
stories of strikingly powerful, independent and modern individuals.
These are women who struggled under the old regime for equality
and legal rights, who refused to relinquish them to a new
authority, and who, in many cases, garnered new powers as
revolutionaries. They became politicized peasants, empowered
religious housewives and, in Sciolino’s tongue in cheek dig
at the chador, "Nuns with guns."
In Persian Mirrors, the tidy compendium of her two
decades of reporting, Sciolino equates the gender question
in Iran with race relations in America. These are the fault
lines that our respective governments straddle uneasily. Iranian
women have learned to use the veil as a shield from behind
which they are free to assault any foe, be it bureaucrat,
taxi driver or "morals" police. Unassailable in
the trappings of respectability, law-abiding Iranian women
are among the most politicized and educated in the Islamic
world. To be sure, Iranian women face an uphill battle for
full equality, with the law still heavily biased to favor
husbands in property matters and marital disputes. Much of
daily life is still sexually segregated, and sexual crimes
are still generally blamed on the woman.
But injustices and unfavorable odds seem to be the lot of
ordinary Iranians everywhere. Men and women alike must learn
to pursue privacy in a police state and to seek answers outside
of Islamic law. Bird, whose brief encounter with Persian loopholes
taught her to circumvent travel restrictions, concludes Iran
is "a country of unruly children. Everyone, myself included,
was trying to get away with something and hoping that we wouldn’t
get caught." As for the authorities, those "distant
parents," time has shown that the Islamic Revolution
and the upheaval that it brought was truly a popular revolution.
The will of the people continues to drive the course of the
revolution – now in the new millennium, towards economic revival,
even at the expense of the religious resurgence in the rest
of the Islamic world.
This is particularly true of the non-Shiite communities of
Iran. In a society based on Shari’a law, the role of minorities
are a critical indicator of the broader social climate. Bird
-- whose three-month stay takes her from the cosmopolitan
circles of northern Tehran to the fundamentalist stronghold
of Qom -- writes at length about her encounters with the ethnic
communities that make up over 40 percent of the country’s
population.
Armenians, who of all minorities enjoy the most respect and
parliamentary representation, tell her that they are at home
in the Islamic Republic. The Kurds of Sanandaj and the Baha’i
community of Tabriz, on the other hand, face constant persecution
due to their respective tribalism (considered a nationalist
threat) and faith (considered heretical). But throughout the
country and its religious diversity, Bird finds a common pride
in Iran and its Islamic revolution. The most important legacy
of the revolution, she concludes, is a national self-respect.
In the years since the death of the Ayatollah Khomeini, the
Iranian people have become practiced at dispelling fervor,
fostering nuance, and elevating individualism in their revolution.
Also in that time, the population has doubled, so that today
65 percent of all Iranians are under the age of twenty-five.
When the youth take to the streets with banners and slogans,
it is to demand jobs, not jihad.
Technology has forced the rigid theocracy to make concessions
to modernity: clerics and medressahs have embraced computers
for their time-consuming textual scholarship. And the illicit
pleasures of the Shah’s era can be spotted in many a private
home or club. Even at the Laleh Hotel, run by the Ministry
of Islamic Guidance and Culture, has a store of brandy-snifters
hidden behind the bar "just in case." Both Bird
and Sciolino take special care to note the subtle work of
time in tempering the strident tones of the revolution.
Only about 2,000 American tourists visited Iran in 1998.
That’s less than a third of the average number of Iranians
who have immigrated to the US yearly since the revolution.
It’s no surprise that Iran remains an enigma to Americans.
Even as the people of Iran push at the confines of their closed
society, Westerners still see a nation partitioned by a veil.
Glimpses like those from Bird and Sciolino are rare in their
clarity.
Editor’s Note: Elizabeth Kiem is a freelance writer
based in Washington, D.C.
Email this article
Posted January 24, 2001 ©Eurasianet
http://www.eurasianet.org
 |
 |
The Central Eurasia Project aims, through its website, meetings,
papers, and grants, to foster a more informed debate about the social,
politcal and economic developments of the Caucasus and Central Asia.
It is a program of the Open Society Institute-New York. The Open
Society Institute-New York is a private operating and grantmaking
foundation that promotes the development of open societies around
the world by supporting educational, social, and legal reform, and by
encouraging alternative approaches to complex and controversial
issues.
The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily represent
the position of the Open Society Institute and are the sole
responsibility of the author or authors.
|
 |
 |
|