Kyrgyzstan: Protests as Party Questions Result
Kyrgyzstan's experiment with pluralistic democratic rule faltered on October 12 when one party that narrowly missed getting into parliament questioned the results of the October 10 elections. The controversy threatens to undermine Kyrgyzstan's attempts to break Central Asia's autocratic political mould and has angered party supporters in the restive southern regions, threatening to unleash another round of destabilizing protests as the winners try to form a stable coalition government.
The nationalist Butun Kyrgyzstan (United Kyrgyzstan) party claims that electoral officials “playing with the figures” have deprived them of a voice in parliament. Many supporters – who took to the streets in Bishkek and the southern city of Osh, the party’s political heartland – believe the manipulation was deliberate.
The row hinges on the number of votes parties needed to take parliamentary seats. The national threshold is 5 percent of the total electorate. Before the election the Central Electoral Commission (CEC) said there were 2.8 million voters and the number of votes required was 141,828. When election results came in on October 11, the CEC put Butun Kyrgyzstan’s share at 4.84 percent, leaving it outside parliament – but it transpired that the party had won 145,455 votes. On October 12 the CEC explained the discrepancy: it said the electorate was actually 3 million, not 2.8 million, so the number of votes required had shot up to 150,000.
“How can the population of Kyrgyzstan grow by 200,000 overnight?” the angry party leader, Adakhan Madumarov, asked at a press conference, accusing the CEC of “playing with the figures.”
The CEC rejects the charge – though it has not clearly explained how the discrepancy occurred – and says the automated electoral system, which is called Shayloo (Election), cannot lie. “Butun Kyrgyzstan can say what it wants, but according to the data of the Shayloo system, this party did not overcome the 5 percent barrier,” CEC Chairman Akylbek Sariev told a press conference on October 12.
“I know that they didn’t make the 5 percent threshold, which is what their supporters are protesting against now,” CEC member Mikhail Korsunskiy told EurasiaNet.org. “The only thing I suggest to them is to replace the people of Kyrgyzstan who voted wrongly, if that is what they think. The CEC didn’t change the threshold of 5 percent […] and didn’t change any numbers. They are playing really dangerous games now.”
Furious activists rallied in Bishkek and Osh to demand the party be allowed to take seats. “For some reason they won’t let us into parliament. We’re offended,” Samat Muratov, a supporter at the Osh rally, which took place outside the regional administration building, told EurasiaNet.org. “They’ve done it deliberately.”
“They’ve done it especially because we’re the most opposition-minded party,” said activist Ira Nurkulova. “You can’t just change the figure.”
Around 200 protesters attended the Osh protest, waving banners reading, “The CEC of Kyrgyzstan is bringing chaos!” Simultaneously, some 150 protesters gathered outside the CEC headquarters in Bishkek.
Osh Region governor Sooronbay Jeyenbekov emerged from his office to appease protesters and urge them to rally peacefully. They greeted him with heckling but allowed him to speak and heeded his call.
Party leaders in Bishkek and Osh also called on protesters not to break the law but said they could not prevent people from taking to the streets. “The supporters of the Butun Kyrgyzstan political party are tired of my excessive patience,” Madumarov said. “Butun Kyrgyzstan overcame the 5 percent barrier, and the party’s supporters intend to demand a recount of the votes via actions of civil disobedience. We cannot stop our supporters, although we are urging them to maintain order.” He said the CEC’s “irresponsible behavior” had sparked the protests. Without that, Madumarov said, supporters would not have protested because “we have too fragile a peace in Kyrgyzstan.”
Bearing in mind the need to preserve that fragile peace, the provisional government now faces the challenge of diffusing the row before it escalates.
More photo essays
We would like to hear your opinion about the new site. Tell us what you like, and what you don't like in an email and send it to: firstname.lastname@example.org