|
Features of Conducting Harm Reduction Programs
for Intravenous Drug Users in Central Asia
Igor Vassilenko, IHRD Technical Advisor for Central Asia
Before the 1990’s drug abuse in Central Asia existed among
several population groups but wasn’t as wide spread as it
is now. Homemade drugs like marijuana and opium were used
by marginalized populations. Today, the illegal drug trade
is so pervasive that more and more youth are starting to use
drugs. The paradox is that the new market economy helped the
young generation choose this new lifestyle, this new way of
thinking, and, unfortunately, this new way of relaxation.
It is certain that the drug expansion that started in the
1990’s and is ongoing assists with this.
Why does this happen? Central Asia has many territories where
narcotic plants grow. There are regions near the mountains
of Kirgizstan, Tajikistan and Kazakhstan with wild growing
opium poppy and ephedra; and located in Central Asia is Chew
valley where potent cannabis grows, which is the source for
preparing marijuana and hash. One of the main reasons for
drug expansion is Central Asian countries share boarders with
countries that are home to the drug cartel "Golden Crescent"
(Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Iran).
Central Asia has become a new drug market. The price of drugs
in this region is constantly dropping; thus, more and more
drugs are available. In the mid 1990’s a gram of heroin cost
approximately $200; it now costs $50 – $90. But the drug trade
is still profitable. For example, a kilogram of opium in Afghanistan
costs approximately $50, in Tajikistan – approximately $200,
in Kirgizstan – approximately $1000, in Kazakhstan - $3000
to $4000, and in Russia the price can be as high as $10000.
The illegal trade of different drugs can include 10’s of tons.
Additionally, there are cases of merging drug businesses and
law representatives which is a great problem and makes resisting
the drug market quite difficult. Therefore, drugs have penetrated
people’s lives in Central Asian countries and with them has
come HIV, to be discussed later.
Various types of drugs are found in these countries. First
about marijuana and hash. The attitude regarding these drugs
in the east was always tolerant and in many regions the use
of these drugs was a matter of culture, stemming from ancient
times. People used them for treatments, cooking, and as substitutes
for alcohol in countries where it was forbidden. Using drugs
in such ways wasn’t destructive and many people from Central
Asia are less affected by tetracannabiol than people from
Europe or America. But now that marijuana and hash is prevalent
among youth it becomes dangerous as for many it is a step
to using harder drugs such as opium, heroin, and amphetamines.
(Research shows that in several institutions approximately
43% of youth aged 14 – 17 have used marijuana at least once.)
About opium. At the end of the 1980’s, beginning of the 1990’s,
it became more common for this type of drug to be homemade.
This type of drug is prepared at home and used in changeable
groups of 2-5 people. Joint preparation and use with shared
kits facilitates the spread of infections such as hepatitis
and HIV/AIDS among drug users.
Heroin – has been dominating the market for the last 2-3
years, replacing other drugs. Drug users at first sniff it
and within two to three months as the dosage increases many
drug users start injecting it. Heroin, as well as opium, is
used by groups of people with shared kits, which also facilitates
the transmission of HIV and hepatitis C. With the spread of
heroin use one more problem has appeared – overdoses. For
example, at the present moment in Kirgizstan overdosing is
the most wide-spread risk of drug use. In the city of Bishkek
approximately 12 cases of overdoses are registered every week,
a third of which are fatal.
Finally, amphetamine. It is prepared at home from ephedra
or other medicines that are sold in pharmacies. In addition
to the high potency of this drug, there is one more risk associated
with its use. It is used by groups of 5-10 people, it stimulates
sexual arousal and users simultaneously become more careless.
All these things lead to dangerous sexual behavior and the
spread of STDs, and the spread of diseases transmitted intravenously.
All of the above mentioned factors led to a 10-fold increase
of drug use in the mid-1990’s in Central Asia. As the governments
of these countries were concerned, they adopted various laws
and programs regarding drug abuse and HIV/AIDS.
The treatment of drug addiction in governmental and private
clinics can be considered successful, especially when we speak
about detoxification and symptom therapy. Treatment is available
for all strata of the community as the payment for it is $50
- $500 in governmental clinics and $1000 – $3000 in private
clinics. Minors are treated free-of-charge. Unfortunately,
with all the effective first steps of therapy, the absence
of rehabilitation programs greatly lessens the outcome of
treatment. For the past two years Central Asia has been addressing
the issue of creating sufficient numbers of rehabilitation
centers and at the present moment new rehabilitation centers
are being established in Kazakhstan and other regions.
Along with the drug use outbreak was the start of an HIV
epidemic. Kazakhstan became a vulnerable region. Within 2-3
years an HIV outbreak occurred in central Kazakhstan, in the
city of Temirtau. The number of HIV infections increased 10-fold,
from 25-30 to 900. 83% of those who were infected are intravenous
drug users. In other Central Asian countries the HIV situation
is more or less quiet but HIV is still spreading in the drug
community, which is the cause of great concern. At the present
moment there are 5 HIV cases in Tajikistan, 53 – in Kirgizstan,
and 1337 – in Kazakhstan.
During the HIV outbreak, Central Asian governments turned
to the United Nations for help; UNAIDS conducted a rapid assessment
of the situation in targeted cities and financed several harm
reduction projects. In 1999 the Open Society Institute (OSI)
and the International Harm Reduction Development (IHRD) program
also started a harm reduction program and supported several
projects in Central Asia. Currently there are 12 projects
in this region (6 in Kazakhstan, 3 in Kirgizstan, and 3 in
Tajikistan).
Conducting a harm reduction program in Central Asia has several
features of both general and more specific natures, which
depend on various factors. All these features can be divided
into several groups.
First: Imperfect legislation for conducting harm
reduction projects. In many Asian countries governments
adopted AIDS prevention laws such as the governmental decree
"About Programs for Preventing and Fighting AIDS."
However, legislation for conducting harm reduction projects
which identify their status and possible financing was absent
until the start of this year. Therefore, organizations that
run harm reduction projects have had to lobby for local decrees
that make these projects legal. This is not easy as authorities
are often cautious about and sometimes negative towards harm
reduction projects, especially when these projects are proposed
and implemented by non-governmental organizations (NGOs).
The exception is found in cities where the threat of an HIV
epidemic is imminent or the reputation of the NGO allows it
to successfully lobby for the program. At the start of 2001,
due to the success and achievements of some harm reduction
projects, the governments of some countries adopted different
laws in which harm reduction strategies are newly mentioned.
Second: Negative community attitudes towards needle-exchange
programs. This can often be explained by culture, ways
of thinking, and negative attitudes regarding drug use and
drug users, as well as the lack of knowledge about the effectiveness
of harm reduction projects. It is possible to overcome these
obstacles with the help of gradual work with the community
via good public relations. The effectiveness of harm reduction
projects depends on forming tolerant community attitudes towards
drug users. This is most important at the beginning of project
development and success greatly depends on it.
Third: Unconvinced drug users. Drug users often
can’t even fathom this approach to the problems of drug use
and AIDS. There is no harm reduction practice in many Central
Asian cities; therefore, drug users are often wary of intervention
within their community. Sometimes project organizers repel
drug users due to their lack of knowledge about the peculiarities
of the behavior of drug users. To overcome these difficulties
it is necessary to attract volunteers from the drug using
community who know all the nuances which should be considered.
Additionally, our experience showed the necessity of regular
trainings for volunteers who participate in outreach work.
One feature of harm reduction in Central Asia is the intense
role of outreach work, important because the specifics of
drug use in these countries differs from European countries
– many drug users prepare and use drugs at home and with a
group.
As already stated, OSI and IHRD currently support 12 harm
reduction projects. Half of the projects have worked for 1-2
years and have had certain successes. In six cities in Central
Asia, harm reduction projects achieved great results: regularly
occurring needle-exchanges, distribution of necessary harm
reduction supplies, counseling and medical aid to drug users,
HIV testing, and systematic work with communities to form
more tolerant attitudes towards drug users. In whole there
are 4000 to 5000 drug users involved in these projects. A
number of projects started working last year and they are
very active. For now, we have Central Asian networking which
assists the projects to exchange experience and be united
in resisting the HIV epidemic in Central Asia. In the future,
when we connect Central Asian networking with European networking,
the harm reduction program will have a greater effect. This
will certainly provide the opportunity to exchange experience
and information as well as to coordinate efforts of all countries
in Eurasia in preventing an HIV/AIDS epidemic.
OSI and IHRD international support to Central Asian projects
is quite meaningful as it allows not only the implementation
of projects but the opportunity to demonstrate to governments
the effectiveness of such an approach in preventing the spread
of HIV. This has led to the gradual financing of such projects
by local administrations in some cities and we can assume
that in the future harm reduction projects will be entirely
financed by governmental budgets of Central Asian countries.
Email this article
Posted March 1,
2001 © Eurasianet
http://www.eurasianet.org
 |
 |
The Central Eurasia Project aims, through its website,
meetings, papers, and grants, to foster a more informed
debate about the social, political and economic developments
of the Caucasus and Central Asia. It is a program of the
Open Society Institute-New York. The Open Society Institute-New
York is a private operating and grantmaking foundation
that promotes the development of open societies around
the world by supporting educational, social, and legal
reform, and by encouraging alternative approaches to complex
and controversial issues.
The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily
represent the position of the Open Society Institute and
are the sole responsibility of the author or authors.
|
 |
 |
|