EURASIA INSIGHT
9/14/07
A EurasiaNet Partner Post from BBC Monitoring
Print this article
Email this article
Text of report by Tajik news agency Asia-Plus website
Dushanbe, 13 September: Our regions population is about 55 million, and common history and culture unite all of us.
We should think about cooperation that will not hinder our historical relations, but facilitate our trade and economic relations, Kazakh President Nursultan Nazarbayev believes.
He expressed this opinion to journalists at a joint news conference following a meeting with the Tajik president, recalling that Kazakhstan was the initiator of setting up a Central Asian economic union.
For his part, answering a question from journalists regarding his attitude to setting up a Central Asian economic union, President Emomali Rahmon of Tajikistan noted: "We are in favour of integration. According to conclusions of the World Bank, only the removal of artificial barriers will make it possible to double GDP."
However, in the Tajik presidents opinion, it is necessary to observe several conditions in order to set up this union.
"First, the countries in the region should become members of this union on an absolutely equal basis. Second, there should be a single legal framework. Third, the free movement of goods should be ensured. And lastly, members of the union should pursue the main goal, that is to rationally use water and energy and mineral resources," Emomali Rahmon believes.
Editor’s Note: Source: Asia-Plus news agency website, Dushanbe, in Russian 13 Sep 07
Posted September 14, 2007 © Eurasianet
http://www.eurasianet.org
|
The Central Eurasia Project aims, through its website,
meetings, papers, and grants, to foster a more informed
debate about the social, political and economic
developments of the Caucasus and Central Asia.
It is a program of the Open Society
Institute-New York. The Open Society Institute-New
York is a private operating and grantmaking foundation
that promotes the development of open societies around
the world by supporting educational, social, and legal
reform, and by encouraging alternative
approaches to complex and controversial issues.
The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily
represent the position of the Open Society Institute and
are the sole responsibility of the author or
authors.
|
|