EURASIA INSIGHT
10/25/07
A EurasiaNet Partner Post from BBC Monitoring
Print this article
Email this article
Text of report by Russian state news agency ITAR-TASS
Bishkek, 23 October: The referendum held in Kyrgyzstan on a new draft constitution "did not comply with the international standards to which Kyrgyzstan has committed itself ", a statement circulated by the US embassy in Bishkek today says.
The statement says that the USA pointed to "a limited progress" demonstrated by the country in holding the referendum. It notes the fact that the Central Electoral Commission [CEC] prepared the polling stations and necessary materials, and local observers "were allowed to monitor the process of voting". "However, we share the concerns of the OSCE over reports about violations, including credible reports about ballot-stuffing and overstated data on the number of votes," the statement says.
In view of this, the United States has urged Kyrgyzstan to move towards "greater democracy for the citizens of the country" and specifically stressed the need for improving preparations for the forthcoming parliamentary election" and setting the date for the early election in a timely manner.
Data from the Kyrgyz CEC says that over 80 per cent of voters participated in the vote, and three fourth of them supported the new edition of the constitution proposed by President Kurmanbek Bakiyev.
Editor’s Note: Source: ITAR-TASS news agency, Moscow, in Russian 0813 gmt 23 Oct 07
Posted October 25, 2007 © Eurasianet
http://www.eurasianet.org
|
The Central Eurasia Project aims, through its website,
meetings, papers, and grants, to foster a more informed
debate about the social, political and economic
developments of the Caucasus and Central Asia.
It is a program of the Open Society
Institute-New York. The Open Society Institute-New
York is a private operating and grantmaking foundation
that promotes the development of open societies around
the world by supporting educational, social, and legal
reform, and by encouraging alternative
approaches to complex and controversial issues.
The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily
represent the position of the Open Society Institute and
are the sole responsibility of the author or
authors.
|
|